Skip to content
Open access

One-year change in the triglyceride-glucose index and subsequent incident hyperuricemia: a retrospective landmark cohort study

Oct 2026 · BMC Endocrine Disorders · 0 citations

Abstract

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is associated with hyperuricemia, but the longitudinal interpretation of within-person change is complicated when repeated exposure measurements overlap with outcome ascertainment. We examined whether one-year change in the TyG index was associated with subsequent incident hyperuricemia among adults undergoing repeated annual health examinations. We conducted a retrospective landmark cohort study using annual health-examination data from 2023 to 2025 at a tertiary hospital in China. Adults had to remain normouricemic through the 2024 landmark. The prespecified primary analysis evaluated 2023–2024 TyG change in a joint model with baseline TyG, age, sex, and the most recent pre-outcome serum urate and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values from 2024. A complementary baseline-covariate model used 2023 serum urate and eGFR. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 21,188 participants, 1,171 (5.5%) developed hyperuricemia in 2025. In the prespecified primary model, a 1-standard-deviation (SD) greater one-year TyG change was associated with incident hyperuricemia after adjustment for baseline TyG, age, sex, 2024 eGFR and 2024 serum urate (RR 1.120, 95% CI 1.061–1.181). The complementary baseline-covariate model using 2023 eGFR and serum urate gave a similar estimate (RR 1.139, 95% CI 1.080–1.201). Adding one-year TyG change increased the apparent C-statistic only slightly, from 0.801 to 0.803. In this repeated health-examination cohort, greater one-year TyG change was associated with subsequent incident hyperuricemia after accounting for baseline TyG and the most recent pre-outcome urate and renal-function values. The incremental gain in discrimination was very small, and the findings should be interpreted as observational associations rather than evidence of clinical predictive utility or causality.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.