THE POLITICS-BUREAUCRATIC INTERFACE IN THE RECRUITMENT, PROMOTION, AND TRAINING OF CIVIL SERVANTS IN AMHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA

Abstract

This study examines the politics-bureaucracy interface in the recruitment, promotion, and training of civil servants in the Amhara National Regional State of Ethopia. Employing a mixed-methods design, data were collected through surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Descriptive statistics were used to assess civil servants’ perceptions of merit-based practices versus political influence, while an ordered probit model was applied to identify factors shaping these perceptions. Qualitative data were analysed thematically to uncover recurrent patterns and interpretations. The results indicate divergent views regarding the application of merit principles; however, a substantial majority perceived that recruitment processes are not consistently merit-driven due to weak personnel management systems, ineffective assessment procedures, political interference, and nepotism. Political influence was perceived to be more pronounced in promotion and training decisions than in recruitment. The ordered probit results show that civil servants in professional and administrative roles are more likely to report political interference across personnel processes, whereas those in managerial positions are less likely to acknowledge such influence. Overall, the findings suggest that despite longstanding national commitments to meritocratic civil service reform, political favouritism and personal networks continue to undermine fair recruitment, promotion, and training practices in the region.