Chat Assisted Reinforcement Learning (CARL) bridges gaps through a human-AI co-design interface architecture that enforces interactive specification prior to code generation and then enables subsequent verification and parameter alterations via iteration.
Abstract
Failure of applied Reinforcement Learning (RL) to solve a given problem predominantly stems from unaddressed specification gaps, where the intent of human experts in the problem's domain is inaccurately or incompletely translated by AI into mathematical objectives, constraints, and reward functions. Failure can also stem from unaddressed performance gaps, where human domain experts are unable to determine the validity of the RL based solution or where parameters (i.e., hyperparameters or weights on the reward terms comprising the reward) are poorly chosen. Chat Assisted Reinforcement Learning (CARL) bridges these gaps through a human-AI co-design interface architecture that enforces interactive specification prior to code generation and then enables subsequent verification and parameter alterations via iteration. More specifically, CARL leads domain experts through a structured ten-step workflow for each iteration using step-specific skill files, domain-aware suggestions via an assistant persona (called Trillian), and compact decision summaries that maintain context across iterations without context overload. Once the domain expert confirms the Markov decision process (MDP) specified by this procedure, CARL's autonomous tool-use loop generates, tests, executes, and debugs an end-to-end RL training pipeline, followed by an interactive post-training diagnosis and revisit step that allows for verification and parameter alteration before running a new iteration if desired.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.