Skip to content
Open access

The Ways in Which Stakeholders Make Decisions About AI and Novel Technologies for the Health Care of Older Adults: Qualitative Interview Study

Jul 2026 · JMIR Aging · Vol 9, pp. e86148 · 0 citations · 35 references
Medicine

TL;DR

As with prior health-related technology innovations, aligning decisional priorities across stakeholders is critical to motivate impactful AI health technologies for older adults.

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health among older adults, yet how different stakeholders decide to develop, finance, and adopt AI innovations is not well understood. Objective This study aimed to understand the decision-making of different stakeholders regarding AI and technologies for the health care of older adults. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 older adults and care partners, 15 clinicians, 8 health system or insurance leaders, 5 investors, and 6 technology developers. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results All stakeholders considered cost, value, and usability important in adopting AI health technologies but emphasized different aspects of each concept. Older adults and care partners prioritized out-of-pocket costs and ease of use, whereas payers emphasized disease prevalence and implementation feasibility. Developers and investors focused on profitability and scalability, resulting in tension with end users’ priorities. Participant suggestions included problem-driven design, greater stakeholder engagement, public-private partnerships, and educating older adults about AI. Conclusions As with prior health-related technology innovations, aligning decisional priorities across stakeholders is critical to motivate impactful AI health technologies for older adults.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

How can we use AI to integrate community health and social care responsibly and ethically?

This workshop addresses the urgent need for responsible AI adoption in health and social care by equipping participants with a practical framework for critically evaluating AI applications and leaving with enhanced AI understanding and actionable insights to guide ethical, sustainable, and value-based implementation of...

Marco Bardus, Derek Ward, Elinor Laws et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Stakeholder Perspectives on the Integration of AI in Diabetes Care: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Although stakeholders perceived AI to be useful for diabetes care, these qualitative findings do not demonstrate clinical effectiveness, safety, or improved patient outcomes.

Héctor Martínez-Martínez, Julia Martínez-Alfonso, Belén Sánchez-Rojo-Huertas et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Acceptability of AI-applications in routine clinical care for children and adolescents: perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, growing interest has emerged in its potential application in pediatric healthcare. Understanding the factors influencing AI acceptability among parents and clinical staff is an important prerequisite for facilitating its integration in clinical ro...

F. Lin, A. Bischops, Janna-Lina Kerth et al. · 0 citations
Review

DETERMINANTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS ADOPTION AMONG MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: THE ROLES OF EMPATHY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRUST

This article shows how the Technology Acceptance Model and Technology Trust are combined in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and how the Perceived Empathy Model (PEM) and Perceived Clarity of Accountability Model (PCA) are extensions of these models.

Hassana Hilale, Abdellatif Chakor · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Patient Perspectives and Expectations on the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Guide Treatment Decision‐Making in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Qualitative Study

Patients expect AI technologies to augment rather than replace clinical judgment, operate transparently, and accommodate individual circumstances, and these priorities should guide AI implementation to ensure trust and meaningful adoption.

Mei-Sing Ong, L. Schanberg, Melanie Kohlheim et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Measuring healthcare professionals' benefit-risk perceptions of medical AI: Scale development and validation.

The AI-BRPS has demonstrated satisfactory initial psychometric properties and shows promise for assessing healthcare professionals' benefit expectations and risk concerns regarding medical AI in similar settings, with potential applications in pre-implementation assessment and future evaluation of intervention outcomes...

Hao-Ning Shi, Yue Xiang, Xi-Lin Yang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.