Skip to content

CGX: OCR-enhanced knowledge graph retrieval for explainable heart failure analysis.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · pp. 105089 · 0 citations · 39 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Initial experiments on heart-failure-focused clinical question answering show that CGX improves evidence retrieval quality and perceived answer reliability over conventional retrieval methods, while reducing total graph construction time by 69.7% under the same input corpus and hardware setting.

Abstract

Knowledge graphs are increasingly used to organize and retrieve complex medical information, yet existing graph-based retrieval systems often suffer from high construction costs, limited scalability as knowledge grows, and limited interpretability in clinical practice. These challenges are amplified in cardiovascular medicine, where data are heterogeneous, noisy, and linked by complex relationships. In this work, we present CGX, a domain-oriented GraphRAG framework that mirrors clinical reasoning for explainable heart failure analysis. CGX structures cardiovascular knowledge into a three-layer hierarchy that spans patient-level observations, guideline-based evidence, and standardized ontologies. An OCR-enhanced preprocessing pipeline combined with a zero-shot biomedical transformer converts PDF-based biomedical literature/guidelines and machine-readable clinical narratives into semantic triples, reducing error propagation compared with vanilla RAG. A Hybrid U-Retrieval mechanism then exploits the graph topology through top-down summary retrieval and bottom-up path refinement, producing explicit evidence chains that support each answer. Initial experiments on heart-failure-focused clinical question answering show that CGX improves evidence retrieval quality and perceived answer reliability over conventional retrieval methods, while reducing total graph construction time by 69.7% under the same input corpus and hardware setting. Under blinded expert clinical evaluation, CGX reduces the rate of clinically risky answers from 12.4%-14.0% to 8.3%, alongside substantially higher scores across all five expert-rated Likert criteria compared with both baselines. These results suggest that CGX offers a scalable and reusable GraphRAG architecture for integrating structured medical knowledge with large language models to support trustworthy clinical decision-making.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

A hierarchical attributed graph RAG framework for biomedical literature retrieval

The results show that effective hierarchical Graph RAG depends not only on graph augmentation, but on constructing, navigating, and weighting the hierarchy, while retrieval quality remains sensitive to clustering and weighting choices.

Maneeha Rani, B. K. Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A knowledge graph–driven big data framework for explainable clinical decision support using heterogeneous healthcare data

A scalable, knowledge graph driven big data framework for explainable clinical decision support that unifies heterogeneous healthcare data into a semantically structured representation and provides transparent, traceable decision paths through knowledge graph reasoning addressing key challenges of interpretability and trust in clinical AI systems is proposed.

Ubaid Ul Rehman, Hufsa Mohsin, Ghulam Mustafa et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Framework for Grounding Healthcare LLMs in a Causal Knowledge Graph: A Cardiovascular Example Pilot

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for healthcare decision support, but their evaluations still reward single-answer accuracy rather than reasoning about interventions, mechanisms, harms, evidence, and uncertainty. We propose a reproducible, graph-centered evaluation framework for intervention-oriented LLM behavior in healthcare and stress-test it in a cardiovascular pilot. The framework has four components: (i) a domain causal knowledge graph in which assertions are first-class, provenance-preserving nodes with stable identifiers; (ii) a scenario-conditioned subgraph extraction step that, given any clinical scenario, retrieves the relevant reified-assertion subgraph; (iii) four controlled grounding conditions that vary how the retrieved subgraph is composed into the model's context (ungrounded C1, knowledge-graph C2, causal-graph C3, integrated C4); and (iv) an automated scoring pipeline, anchored on assertion identifiers, that computes intervention accuracy, and other evaluation measures on a single pass. To test the framework, we built a category-balanced scenario generator across eight reasoning failure modes and instantiated it on a cardiovascular graph. The metric panel discriminates conditions along interpretable, non-redundant axes: C4 obtains the strongest causal edge F1 (0.838), adverse-effect F1 (0.833), evidence accuracy (0.738), and unsupported claim rate (0.114), while C1 obtains the highest raw intervention accuracy (0.948) with no measurable causal or evidential grounding.

Ummara Mumtaz, Aimen Noor, Awais Ahmed · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

KRAKEN: A provenance-tracked knowledge graph for multiomic and wellness research

Existing general-purpose biomedical knowledge graphs tend to focus on disease mechanisms and drug repurposing, leaving multiomic and wellness-relevant content underrepresented. KRAKEN (Knowledge Research & Analysis Kit for Evidence Networks) addresses this gap by integrating existing graphs (including Translator KG Open, RTX-KG2, and ROBOKOP) with specialized sources such as RefMet, LIPID MAPS, NIH Common Data Elements, Polygenic Score Catalog, and derived wellness measures including biological age and biological BMI. The resulting graph spans ∼15M nodes and ∼113M edges across 62 entity types. KRAKEN adopts the Biolink Model as its semantic layer, ensuring compatibility with standardized resources emerging from the NIH NCATS Biomedical Data Translator program. A lightweight, modular build system rebuilds the full graph (including entity resolution), with peak memory consumption <48 GB, and supports flexible inclusion or exclusion of sources, allowing the user to scope the graph to a domain of interest. Built-in analytical tools include multi-hop reasoning, subgraph extraction, text, vector and hybrid entity search, and enrichment analyses, all accessible through an interactive web interface, a REST API, and a Model Context Protocol server, the last enabling direct consumption by agentic and LLM-based systems. KRAKEN is freely available at https://app.krakenkg.com. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Amy K. Glen, D. Witherington, Trent Leslie et al. · 0 citations