It is suggested that the path a brain traces through anesthesia is a label-efficient correlate of latent vulnerability, motivating prospective validation of the representation across two cohorts and two acquisition systems.
Abstract
General anesthesia offers a rare opportunity to observe the human brain under a standardized, controlled perturbation. Yet intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) is almost always reduced to a single proprietary depth index, collapsing a rich trajectory into one number and discarding how a brain moves between states. Here we ask whether the geometry of that trajectory, not merely the depth it reaches, carries clinically meaningful information. Using similarity-based self-supervised learning on raw, two-electrode frontal EEG, with no labels, we place each recording within a low-dimensional space in which anesthetic depth becomes one readable axis while the shape of a patient's path encodes additional structure. We validate the representation across two cohorts and two acquisition systems totaling more than 1,000 patients. Depth of anesthesia is predicted accurately (BIS mean absolute error = 3.2, R2 = 0.82), and in the sparse-montage setting our compact ( 68k parameter) model remains competitive with EEG foundation models orders of magnitude larger (4M-157M parameters), indicating that matching the representation to the recording dominates raw scale. The learned space organizes age along its own gradient, independent from depth, without supervision. The same space also aligns with interpretable anesthetic signatures like frontal alpha, slow-delta, and burst suppression, linking this data-driven representation to established neurophysiology. On an independent cohort with longitudinal follow-up, the geometry of the early trajectory separates 30- month cognitive and mortality outcomes complementary to age (AUROC 0.86). These results suggest that the path a brain traces through anesthesia is a label-efficient correlate of latent vulnerability, motivating prospective validation.
This work proposes MAPA, an otherwise vanilla masked autoencoder with two spatial encodings, an anatomical region embedding and a relative positional encoding that together enable it to learn neural representations that transfer to unseen subjects and across various tasks.
Ben-Ting Tang, Z. Spalding, G. Cogan· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Electroencephalography (EEG) signals drift over time, which can cause static brain-computer interface (BCI) models to degrade in practice. We present a benchmark for online adaptation and compare two widely used pipeline families, Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) and Riemannian covariance-based methods, under time-ordered...
B. Kozyrskiy, Artem M. Grachev, Abraham Camelo-Guerrero· 0 citations
Brain signal decoding is challenging because neural recordings are noisy and vary across individuals, while labeled data are often limited. Recent attention-based models on the symmetric positive definite (SPD) manifold have nevertheless achieved strong performance using covariance and connectivity representations, yet...
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based closed-loop neuromodulation calls for a subject-specific structured state, as opposed to a single disease probability, specifying which brain regions are deviant, at which frequencies, and at which lags. Sensor-space models keep the strongest diagnostic evidence without anatomy, sourc...
Jia-Ying Wang, Shou-Qian Shi, Yu-Tong Chen et al.· 0 citations
iMINDBench is introduced, an iEEG Multi-Institution Neural Decoding Benchmark that evaluates models on a shared suite of fifteen decoding tasks across three naturalistic movie-watching datasets and finds that the evaluated pretrained systems generally outperform baselines within their respective preprocessing tracks, w...
Geeling Chau, Saba Hashemi, Yonghyeon Gwon et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.