Oct 2026· Journal of Risk and Financial Management· 0 citations· 59 references
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm financial performance while considering the moderating role of institutional quality and the sensitivity of the results to control-variable selection. The analysis uses 68,244 firm-year observations for 6204 listed firms across developed and developing economies between 2011 and 2021. Firm performance is measured using Tobin’s Q, return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE), while ESG is examined through its aggregate score and its environmental, social, and governance pillars. We use Random Forest to rank candidate controls, and we combine its rankings with multicollinearity diagnostics. Conventional full-control and Random Forest-informed specifications are then compared using OLS and quantile regressions. The results show that control selection materially affects the magnitude, direction, and statistical significance of the estimated ESG coefficients. Although there are clear relationships between ESG and performance variables in the baseline model, they become statistically insignificant when using the firm-fixed effects models, implying that the findings arise mainly from the persistent difference between firms rather than within-firm ESG performance. In addition, market responses are more selective: the Social pillar is positively associated with Tobin’s Q, whereas the Environmental pillar is negatively valued in several specifications. Institutional moderation also varies across ESG pillars, governance dimensions, performance measures, and quantiles. Government Effectiveness and Rule of Law provide the most consistent evidence of positive moderation for the aggregate ESG–Tobin’s Q relationship, while the evidence is weaker or less stable for ROA and ROE. Our findings demonstrate that the financial relevance of ESG is context-dependent and sensitive to empirical model specification.
Results indicate that firm size, liquidity, productivity, and cash-to-asset ratio have significant positive effects on financial performance, while the debt ratio shows a significant negative effect, particularly on ROA.
O. Zeidan, Mustafa Habib Mahdi· Journal of economic and admi...· 0 citations
Background: The average market valuation of SRI-KEHATI firms declined during 2020–2024, raising questions about whether investors value environmental, social, and governance performance differently.
Objective: This study examines the separate effects of environmental, social, and governance performance on firm value an...
Venny Ratnasari Narulita, E. Endri· Inkubis Jurnal Ekonomi dan B...· 0 citations
This study examines whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance improves risk-adjusted stock returns and identifies the information-transmission channels underlying this relationship. Using an unbalanced panel of 1,104 Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2019 and Bloomberg ESG scores, the anal...
Cheng Qian· World Journal of Economics a...· 0 citations
Purpose – This study examines whether ESG pillar scores are associated with corporate financial performance, measured by return on assets, among a purposively selected subsample of 13 Kompas 100 Index companies with complete LSEG Refinitiv ESG coverage during 2020-2024, responding to unsettled evidence on ESG financial...
Annisa Pujijayanti, Dwi Urip Wardoyo· Indonesian Journal of Taxati...· 0 citations
This study looks at how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), and firm size affect firm value in companies listed in the ESG Leaders Index between 2020 and 2024 using Return on Assets (ROA) as a mediating variable. While ESG is represented by the ESG Risk Rating, the GCG variable...
Muhammad Fadly, Ferikawita M. Sembiring· Sinergi International Journa...· 1 citation
This study aims to examine the relationship between firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and their investment efficiency (IE), focusing on emerging markets. It investigates the moderating effects of board characteristics on this relationship.
Using a sample of 361 nonfinancial firms...
I. Yilmaz, Haitham Nobanee· Corporate Governance : The i...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.