Oct 2026· Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery· Vol 146· 0 citations· 33 references
Medicine
TL;DR
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PRP demonstrated limited and inconsistent effects on imaging-based structural outcomes in knee OA, and did not confer significant and consistent benefits in medial tibial cartilage measurements, cartilage defect progression, synovitis, or most WORMS domains.
Abstract
To assess the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on imaging-based structural outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2026 evaluating imaging-based structural effects of PRP in knee OA. Risk ratio (RR) was used to evaluate binary outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) for continuous endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 12 RCTs involving 1,200 patients were included. PRP was associated with greater improvement in patellofemoral cartilage thickness/volume compared with control treatments (SMD 0.94; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.34), whereas no significant differences were observed for medial tibial cartilage thickness/volume or cartilage defect progression. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based structural scores showed no between-group differences in Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) osteophytes or subchondral cysts, although PRP demonstrated a significant reduction in bone marrow edema (SMD − 0.40; 95% CI, − 0.71 to − 0.09). Synovitis did not differ overall between groups (SMD − 0.22; 95% CI, − 0.43 to 0.00). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PRP demonstrated limited and inconsistent effects on imaging-based structural outcomes in knee OA, and did not confer significant and consistent benefits in medial tibial cartilage measurements, cartilage defect progression, synovitis, or most WORMS domains. The favorable findings observed for patellofemoral cartilage and bone marrow edema should be interpreted with caution. Thus, the findings do not provide clear evidence supporting PRP as a structural disease-modifying treatment, and additional high-quality RCTs using standardized imaging endpoints are warranted.
It is suggested that PRP may offer superior symptomatic and functional benefits in knee osteoarthritis, although larger and standardized trials are still needed.
E. Pasqualotto, T. Pasqualotto, L. Lunelli et al.· Orthopaedic Journal of Sport...· 0 citations
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) in knee osteoarthritis and to identify preparation and application-related factors influencing outcomes.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020, this study was registered in...
Chen-Guang Zhong, Kun Wang, Xing Hu et al.· Arthroscopy: The Journal of...· 1 citation
To compare the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone versus PRP combined with hyaluronic acid (HA) in adults with knee osteoarthritis.
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2025 comparing PRP alon...
E. Pasqualotto, T. Pasqualotto, L. Lunelli et al.· Orthopaedic Journal of Sport...· 0 citations
Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used increasingly to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to describe PRP use for knee OA and identify patient- and treatment-specific factors associated with clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: Patients with knee OA undergoing intra-articular PRP injections would demons...
Jonathan P. Coss, Kenar Z. Gelman, Ryan Lingor et al.· Sports health· 0 citations
IMPORTANCE
Knee osteoarthritis is among the leading causes of pain-related disability in adults, and intra-articular injection occupies an established niche between conservative management and arthroplasty. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are both in widespread clinical use, yet which agent should b...
D. Alshehri, Raed M. Sharaf, Abdulraheem A. Almokhtar et al.· Journal of ISAKOS Joint Diso...· 0 citations
Although no significant differences were found in pain and functional improvement between PRP and control groups for pain or function, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the very low certainty of evidence.
Antonio Madrazo-Ibarra, Daniel de la Huerta Meza, Jose M. Gutierrez Naranjo et al.· PM & R : the journal of inju...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.