Sep 2026· Advancement of science· 0 citations· 64 references
Medicine
Abstract
ABSTRACT Among emerging energy storage technologies, lithium (Li) metal anode‐based solid‐state batteries (SSBs) have drawn considerable attention, as they promise greater energy density alongside improved safety relative to traditional Li‐ion cells. Despite this promise, the performance of such systems remains constrained by intrinsic obstacles tied to the nucleation and growth of voids at the Li‐solid electrolyte (SE) interface as stripping proceeds. Void morphology and contact distribution jointly dictate the coupled reaction‐diffusion behavior at the interface, thereby affecting the interfacial resistance. In the present study, we track the detailed evolution of a single void as Li stripping progresses, characterizing how its shape, size, and overall morphology evolve under the action of the distinct modes of surface diffusion, i.e., terrace, step, and interlayer diffusion. The depth and size attained by the void are strongly governed by coupling between reaction kinetics and the surface diffusion modes, which together dictate the dominant diffusion pathways. In addition, the role of operating temperature in mitigating void growth under high‐reaction‐rate conditions is examined. Extending the single‐void analysis to the collective voids regime, we resolve the progression toward a multi‐clustered morphology and determine the critical void fraction value the onset of percolation, beyond which dispersed voids coalesce into a connected network. Understanding these interactions between voids helps identify the mechanisms that control the final interfacial structure and provides guidance for designing stable, low‐resistance interfaces in SSBs.
Increased energy density and safety relative to conventional lithium (Li)-ion batteries motivate the development of solid-state batteries (SSBs). However, maintaining interface stability at the metal anode–solid electrolyte (SE) interface remains a critical challenge to achieving practical areal capacities, especiall...
Deep Chatterjee, Abhinand Ayyaswamy, B. Vishnugopi et al.· ACS Energy Letters· 0 citations
Lithium metal anodes (LMAs), with ultrahigh theoretical capacity and extremely low electrochemical potentials, are key enablers for next‐generation high‐energy‐density batteries (LMBs). However, their practical deployment remains severely impeded by nonuniform Li nucleation, dendritic growth, drastic volume fluctua...
Anode‐free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) maximize energy density by eliminating anode host materials, but their lifetime is governed by Li deposition on the current collector (CC)—a heterogeneous nucleation and growth process. Current research mainly focuses on electrolyte or artificial interphase engineering, where...
Si-Da Huo, Li Wang, Yue Wang et al.· Advanced Energy Materials· 0 citations
Sodium metal anodes (SMAs) possess a high theoretical capacity (1166 mAh g⁻¹), a low redox potential (−2.71 V vs. SHE), and abundant sodium resources, making sodium metal batteries (SMBs) highly promising next-generation energy storage systems. However, their practical applications remain severely constrained by inst...
Chu-Tao Wang, Yong-Qi Ye, Ding-Rong Deng et al.· Materials Futures· 0 citations
Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) are promising candidates for high‐energy‐density energy storage systems. However, their practical applications are severely hindered by interfacial instability and uncontrolled lithium deposition, which lead to dendrite growth, low Coulombic efficiency, and rapid capacity decay. In this r...
Ying-Rui Liu, Shuang Liu, Sai Che et al.· Advanced Energy Materials· 1 citation
Sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) promise high energy density by using lithium metal anodes, but their practical implementation is limited by severe interfacial instability. At the lithium metal/sulfide electrolyte interface, coupled chemical, electrochemical, and mechanical degradation ac...