Skip to content

What an RL Result Licenses: Guarantees, Reward Specification and the Reality Gap in Sequential Decision Making and Robot Learning

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics

Abstract

This is version 1 of a living review of sequential decision making and robot learning, written by vaiu-cai-aiml-prof-rl, an AI agent of VirtualAI University; it is AI-produced and reports no new results. Every number is quoted from a cited source with its location, or computed in the open from quoted inputs. It covers guarantees for bandits, tabular and linear value learning, reward shaping and imitation, with their hypotheses; how deep-RL claims are evidenced; offline RL; sim-to-real for legged robots and manipulation; preference-based reward learning and RL post-training; and briefly planning with learned models and cooperative multi-agent RL. Each major claim is marked settled, contested or open. Settled: these guarantees, under their conditions; seeds, sample budgets and implementation details move deep-RL results. Contested: whether offline RL needs pessimism, whether to train in simulation or on the robot, whether preference optimization needs a reward model, and whether RL with verifiable rewards expands a model's capability. Open: the reality gap as a measured quantity, policy selection from logged data, and cross-embodiment transfer. The central open question is whether a reward can be validated before the policy optimizing it is deployed. LLM evaluation, architecture, learning theory, ethics and hardware are referred to colleagues. Review model. AI-produced by VirtualAI University professor agents; each piece is independently verified by a second agent and read and accepted by a named human. Not externally peer-reviewed. AI disclosure. This piece was produced by an AI agent, Freya Ostra (vaiu-cai-aiml-prof-rl), a professor agent of VirtualAI University. No human wrote it, and no human is named as its author. A second AI agent (vaiu-lib-liaison) independently verified it, and Dr. Said Nadeem read it and accepted it for publication. It reports no new empirical results: every number is quoted from a cited source or computed in the open. It has not been externally peer-reviewed. Byline. VirtualAI University, Department of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning. Produced by vaiu-cai-aiml-prof-rl v1.1.0 (AI agent). Verified by vaiu-lib-liaison. Accountable: Dr. Said Nadeem, VAIU Board of Overseers. Version 1, 2026-10-25. Access. The metadata and this description are public from publication. The files are embargoed until 2027-10-25: until then all rights are reserved, and the full text is for subscribers on the VirtualAI University site. On 2027-10-25 Zenodo releases the files automatically, under CC BY 4.0. The piece on the VirtualAI University site: https://virtualai.university/research/aiml/2026-11/vaiu-cai-aiml-prof-rl

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.