Digital government, circular economy, and public value creation: orga-nizational factors in the adoption of digital technologies in the Federal District (Brazil) and New York State (United States)
Aug 2026· Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana· 0 citations
TL;DR
The findings show that digital technologies contribute to transparency and information integration, but their capacity to generate public value—such as policy coherence, effectiveness, and sustainability—is fundamentally mediated by organizational capacity, coordination mechanisms, and institutional stability.
Abstract
Digital government initiatives are increasingly mobilized to address complex, cross-boundary policy challenges, yet their contribution to public value creation remains highly contingent on organizational and institutional conditions. This paper examines how organizational capacity and interorganizational coordination shape the adoption and use of digital government initiatives in circular economy governance. Building on public value theory and governance network perspectives, the study adopts a qualitative comparative institutional design, analyzing the Federal District (Brazil) as the primary empirical case and drawing analytical insights from New York State (United States). Empirical evidence is based on semi-structured interviews with public managers and technical staff, complemented by document analysis and institutional observation conducted during a visiting PhD period at a U.S. public policy school. The findings show that digital technologies contribute to transparency and information integration, but their capacity to generate public value—such as policy coherence, effectiveness, and sustainability—is fundamentally mediated by organizational capacity, coordination mechanisms, and institutional stability. By explicitly linking circular economy governance to organizational and networked perspectives on public value creation, the study advances digital government research and offers implications for governments in both developing and developed contexts. This is not a comparison between the global North and South, but rather a qualitative study seeking to improve concepts of digital government in both Brazil and the United States.
Cross-sectional survey of 360 Indian Administrative Service officers and senior Group A civil servants across four purposively selected central government ministries in New Delhi offers theoretically grounded and policy-relevant insights for reformers navigating the institutional landscape of one of the world's largest...
A configurational architecture linking digital state capacities, data governance, strategic leadership, intergovernmental coordination, digital inclusion, and public value is proposed, which shifts attention from isolated technology adoption to institutional combinations that support different trajectories of digital t...
Maira Danuse Santos de Oliveira, Virgínia Tâmara Muniz Silva, A. Ferreira· Revista de Estudos Interdisc...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that technological integration must be accompanied by comprehensive cultural shifts within state institutions to achieve sustainable administrative efficiency and enhanced public service delivery.
I. Syafi'i· International Journal of Soc...· 0 citations
Comparing digital governance practices across the three regions contributes to a deeper understanding of digital governance development in Greater China and provides practical implications for policymakers seeking to enhance public service delivery and promote cross-regional policy learning.
Yao-Bao Zhang· Lecture Notes in Education P...· 0 citations
It is concluded that effective digital transformation in Sri Lanka necessitates a multi-pronged approach encompassing legal reform, strategic investment in ICT capacity, strengthened institutional cooperation, and the ethical deployment of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.
V. Papakaran· Sri Lanka Journal of Develop...· 0 citations
It is argued that while technology has enhanced efficiency and transparency, governance outcomes ultimately depend on institutional capacity, inclusivity, and ethical commitment, and that Governance 4.0 represents not merely a technological shift but a normative redefinition of democratic governance in India.
Sanchita Ray· LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY REVIEW· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.