TAU-Bench is introduced, a track-centric benchmark for jointly evaluating anomaly instance tracking and fine-grained anomaly understanding, and shows that models producing plausible anomaly interpretations may still fail to localize and track the correct instance reliably, revealing a persistent gap between semantic reasoning and visual grounding.
Abstract
Humans understand anomalous events through a coherent perceptual process in which they identify the focal instance, follow its behavior as the event unfolds, and interpret why it violates the expectations of the surrounding scene. Video anomaly understanding (VAU) seeks to endow models with a similar capability, moving beyond deciding whether a video is anomalous toward explaining how the event develops and why it matters. Although recent vision--language models (VLMs) can generate detailed and plausible anomaly descriptions, their semantic fluency does not ensure that these interpretations remain grounded in the correct anomaly instance over time. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate tracking and semantic understanding through separate protocols, leaving such instance--semantic inconsistency largely unmeasured. We therefore introduce TAU-Bench, a track-centric benchmark for jointly evaluating anomaly instance tracking and fine-grained anomaly understanding. TAU-Bench contains 1,118 videos, 1,454 tracks, and 202,438 pixel-level masks spanning 49 event and 45 scene categories, together with track-centric annotations that connect instance-level identification, event-level understanding, and scene-level reasoning. To build TAU-Bench at scale, we developed an automated data engine integrating anomaly suitability filtering, anomaly instance track construction, hierarchical caption annotation, and human quality control. Evaluations across representative VLM families show that models producing plausible anomaly interpretations may still fail to localize and track the correct instance reliably, revealing a persistent gap between semantic reasoning and visual grounding. These findings therefore highlight instance-grounded evaluation as an important step toward more faithful and reliable VAU systems.
This work introduces ECVA, a benchmark for Exploring the Causation of Video Anomalies, and proposes AnomShield, a video large language model for reasoning-intensive anomaly understanding that adopts a Chain-of-Thought reasoning paradigm to explicitly determine and extract anomaly-relevant temporal segments.
Hang Du, Guoshun Nan, Jiawen Qian et al.· International Journal of Com...· 11 citations· ⚡3
Glance then Scrutinize (GtS), a training-free framework using static and dynamic textual guidance for coarse-to-fine anomaly grounding and understanding, balancing accuracy and speed, and JeAUG, a metric jointly evaluating semantic interpretability and temporal precision are introduced.
Shibo Gao, Pei-Pei Yang, Xu-Yao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Video-HOCA, a diagnostic benchmark for physical anomaly reasoning in videos, is introduced and it is found that recognition outpaces explanation: Task I scores cluster at 75-88, while Task II macro-F1 stays mostly below 50.
Chang Liu, Yunfan Ye, Qingyang Zhou et al.· 0 citations
AnomalyCraft-700K is presented, a component-controllable synthetic anomaly dataset for fine-grained VAU, containing over 40K videos and over 700K task-level textual annotations and serves as an effective source of supervision from anomaly detection to fine-grained anomaly understanding.
Yu-Zhou Long, Haodong Zhang, Yun-Peng Yang et al.· 0 citations
It is indicated that current VLMs can identify anomalies within individual frames but struggle to integrate information across frames to reason about temporal consistency, and TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal grounding in vision-language models.
Experiments on UCF-Crime and UBnormal show that CSI-VAD consistently improves over the direct holistic baseline and achieves competitive performance against existing methods, showing the advantage of structured context decomposition for training-free video anomaly detection.
Dongjun Kim, Changjae Oh, Andrea Cavallaro et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.