Skip to content
Open access

INFLUENCE OF SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ON CROP FARMERS' PERCEIVED CONTROL MEASURES FOR BUSH BURNING IN KWARA SOUTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT, NIGERIA

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Agricultural Research and Biotechnology · 0 citations

Abstract

Bush burning remains a persistent socio-ecological challenge in savanna landscapes, with implications for agricultural productivity, rural livelihoods and environmental management. This study examined the spatial dimensions of bush-burning control in Kwara South Senatorial District, Nigeria, focusing on how socio-demographic characteristics and location shape perceptions of control measures across Ekiti, Ifelodun, Irepodun, Isin, Offa, Oke-Ero and Oyun Local Government Areas. Data were obtained from 155 adult respondents across 31 settlements using multistage, purposive and snowball sampling. A structured questionnaire with acceptable internal reliability was administered, while descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance and non-parametric tests assessed socio-demographic and spatial variations in perceived control measures. Findings revealed substantial socio-demographic differences across the seven LGAs, particularly in age, education, occupation, marital status, residency duration, farming experience and farm distance. Sensitisation recorded the highest support (92.9%), followed by timely weed control (85.8%) and reporting to community heads (85.2%). Significant spatial differences occurred for fire tracing, farm surveillance, crop restriction, police reporting, community surveillance, financial penalties, mixed cropping and timely weed control, whereas sensitisation and community-head reporting showed no significant spatial variation. Respondent-level associations indicated significant differences in selected control measures by education, occupation, age, marital status, farming experience and residency duration. The study concludes that bush-burning control in Kwara South is a socio-ecological, livelihood and spatial governance challenge requiring differentiated strategies that combine preventive sensitisation, community reporting, surveillance, alternative land-management practices and proportionate enforcement tailored to local conditions.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.