Skip to content
Open access

Care beyond calculation: Artificial intelligence and the moral meaning of care in healthcare

Jul 2026 · Health Sciences Quarterly · Vol 6, pp. 423-427 · 0 citations · 20 references

TL;DR

Whether AI can meaningfully participate in care is examined, ethical tensions between automation and moral attentiveness are identified, and normative limits for AI use in healthcare grounded in human dignity, relational responsibility, and moral agency are proposed.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively embedded in healthcare practices, transforming diagnosis, clinical decision‑making, patient monitoring, and institutional resource allocation. Ethical analyses of AI in healthcare have largely focused on technical issues such as safety, bias, transparency, and accountability [1,2]. While indispensable, these analyses often presuppose a reductive view of healthcare as a technical enterprise focused primarily on efficiency and measurable outcomes. This article advances a purely theoretical ethical analysis centered on care as a moral, relational, and interpretive practice. Drawing on the ethics of care, personalist ethics, virtue ethics, and the philosophy of technology, it argues that care cannot be reduced to calculation or optimization. The article critically examines whether AI can meaningfully participate in care, identifies ethical tensions between automation and moral attentiveness, and proposes normative limits for AI use in healthcare grounded in human dignity, relational responsibility, and moral agency.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INTENSIVE CARE: CLINICAL, ETHICAL, AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTOMATION IN CRITICAL CARE

It is concluded that artificial intelligence constitutes a strategic tool for improving the quality of intensive care, but it does not replace clinical judgment or the ethical centrality of the patient, requiring a balanced integration of technological innovation, patient safety, adequate regulation, and respect for hu...

Antônia Bárbara Barbosa Silva, Décio Oliveira dos Santos, Isabela Molínero de Paula et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Artificial intelligence in medicine: An ethical and legal review.

This review addresses the primary ethical principles relevant to AI in medicine - including respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice - alongside key legal frameworks with respect to liability, data protection, regulatory compliance, and algorithmic transparency.

Sebastian Schleidgen, O. Friedrich · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

From Model Cards to Subtle Care: Competing Logics of Ethics in Healthcare AI

Ethical considerations are increasingly integrated into healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) systems, yet they are typically operationalized in a technical logic disconnected from concrete healthcare practices. This contrasts the emerging logic of situated empirical ethics enacted by practitioners during care, leavi...

Victor Vadmand Jensen, T. O. Andersen, M. T. Høybye et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Legal, Ethical, and Compliance Implications for Responsible Decision-making

The delivery of medical services has changed as a result of the quick integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into global healthcare systems. Still, it has also brought up difficult ethical, legal, and regulatory issues. This study examined the ramifications in relation to Nigeria's healthcare system, highlighting...

Getrude Frimpong · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Healing Without Certainty: The Ethical Significance of Uncertainty in Israeli Medicine in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

It is argued that uncertainty in medicine is a multidimensional feature of practice rather than a single informational deficit that technology can progressively eliminate, and five principles for responsible integration are proposed: complementarity, proportionality, accountability, fairness, and human-centred care.

R. Waitzman · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Ethics consultants’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in ethical decision-making for patients incapacitated with no evident advance directives or surrogates: a qualitative study

Findings highlight the need for equity-centered design, transparent communication of data limitations, interdisciplinary development, and ethics consultant involvement in validation before clinical implementation of artificial intelligence in INEADS care.

Aviv Y. Landau, Marsha Williamson, Jiyoun Song et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.