It is suggested that AI enhances fraud detection, risk assessment, and audit quality, while raising concerns regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, and professional skepticism.
Abstract
This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) in external auditing by synthesizing existing evidence, clarifying key concepts, identifying theoretical and methodological gaps, and outlining future research directions. A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis were conducted on 130 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. The review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, while VOSviewer was used to map research trends, and thematic clusters. Research on AI in auditing has grown substantially, with the United States, China, and the United Kingdom leading scholarly contributions. The analysis identified three dominant research streams: machine learning and fraud detection, audit analytics and big data, and AI adoption and governance. Commonly applied AI techniques include machine learning, neural networks, natural language processing, robotic process automation, and expert systems. The study suggested that AI enhances fraud detection, risk assessment, and audit quality, while raising concerns regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, and professional skepticism. The study develops an integrated framework linking AI applications to audit quality and provides a research agenda to guide future inquiry. The findings offer practical insights for auditors, regulators, and organizations seeking to implement AI responsibly and effectively in audit processes.
It is concluded that the auditing profession is at a critical juncture, requiring a concerted effort from regulators, standard-setters, firms, and educators to navigate the transformative impact of AI.
Geoffrey Odoch· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that XAI is mainly applied to fraud detection, credit assessment, financial auditing, and decision-support processes, with a predominance of techniques such as SHAP and LIME.
Iván Patricio Arias-González, Gabriela Serrano-Torres, Eduardo Ramiro Dávalos-Mayorga et al.· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 1 citation
This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence can support strategic decision-making in private universities, the organizational conditions shaping its value, and the governance and implementation risks that constrain responsible use and identifies four interconnected roles of AI: environmental intelligenc...
Yun-Dong Wu, Wei-Jian Kong· Artificial Intelligence in E...· 0 citations
A systematic review of the literature on methodologies, frameworks, and techniques for auditing AI systems, focusing on legal and ethical considerations and compliance with regulations, reveals gaps in current auditing practices and highlights the importance of incorporating AI value chain stages and AI maturity levels...
Usman Shahbaz, A. Beheshti, B. Abedin et al.· ACM Computing Surveys· 0 citations
The evidence suggests that AI and BDA are most effective when deployed as decision-support mechanisms that complement professional skepticism and audit judgment rather than replace them.
Rosiana Ramadhon, Emmarani Nuristya, Batista Sufa Kefi et al.· Journal of Creative Power a...· 0 citations