Jun 2025· Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies· Vol 2026, pp. 1055-1071· 6 citations· 112 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
An in-depth qualitative analysis of GenAI-usage guidelines from 43 universities across 12 countries reveals several key challenges, including barriers faced by universities in deploying privacy measures and adopting existing security frameworks.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming the educational landscape by augmenting learning paradigms. However, state-of-the-art GenAI systems driving this transformation are predominantly developed and controlled by a small number of private companies; there is little clarity about their data retention practices and limited user control over inputs and outputs. In the context of education, end-users lack the awareness of how to safely adopt GenAI in learning. This raises significant concerns, particularly when proprietary or personally identifiable educational information may be shared with external GenAI platforms. In response to these concerns, universities are developing their own usage guidelines and policies to balance innovation with academic integrity, privacy, and security. Our research seeks to understand these emerging guidelines, with a particular focus on the privacy and security implications of integrating GenAI tools into academic environments -— an area that has received little attention to date. We conducted an in-depth qualitative analysis of GenAI-usage guidelines from 43 universities across 12 countries. Our findings reveal several key challenges, including barriers faced by universities in deploying privacy measures and adopting existing security frameworks. These insights lay the groundwork for designing more robust, privacy-aware GenAI guidelines for higher education.
Recommendations for the design and deployment of secure LLM-enabled XR systems, emphasizing strategies such as security defense in depth, privacy-aware data practices, layered technical safeguards, continuous monitoring, and governance mechanisms that align security controls with the specific risks of immersive and int...
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly evolved from an experimental technology into a foundational component of modern software systems. However, as its adoption grows, protecting sensitive personal data becomes increasingly challenging. Specifically, GenAI systems not only amplify traditional privacy t...
Jonah Bellemans, Qian-Ying Liao, Laurens Sion et al.· 0 citations
This paper compares the reasoning of Chinese and American courts in copyright disputes over training data, traces the concentration of infringement risk at the data-input stage, and considers why the fair use doctrine fits these cases poorly and why licensing and compensation mechanisms no longer work.
Hui-Yao Jian· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
A mixed-methods study combining 12 semi-structured interviews with EdTech professionals and a privacy policy audit of 48 platforms coded across five dimensions suggests that meaningful improvement requires enforceable institutional and regulatory mechanisms rather than voluntary privacy commitments alone.
The large pre-trained models centered on the Transformer architecture have been widely applied in fields such as government affairs, healthcare, and cultural creation, significantly enhancing the efficiency of content production. However, they have also given rise to multiple security and ethical risks: Data leakage ca...
Zi-Ming Xie· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
This study presents a detailed, actionable approach to constructing secure, privacy-focused RAG systems and culminates in the Integrated Privacy-Preserving RAG Framework (IPRAG), a five-tier architecture supported by a three-phase deployment protocol.
Firoz Mohammed Ozman· International Journal of Fro...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.