Skip to content
Open access

Robustness of Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Forecasting Under Realistic Sensor Degradation

2026 · International journal of research and scientific innovation · 0 citations

TL;DR

A robust focused comparative evaluation of seven traffic forecasting approaches suggests that traffic forecasting models should be assessed not only by clean-data accuracy but also by their robustness under degraded sensing conditions before deployment in real intelligent transportation systems.

Abstract

Short-term traffic forecasting plays an important role in intelligent transportation systems, as applications such as route guidance, adaptive traffic signal control, emergency response, congestion mitigation, and logistics planning depend on accurate estimates of future traffic states. Recent spatio-temporal graph neural network models, particularly Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (DCRNN) and Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (STGCN), have improved traffic prediction by representing road sensors as graph nodes and jointly learning spatial and temporal relationships. However, strong performance on clean benchmark datasets does not always guarantee reliability in real-world conditions, where sensor reading may be missing, noisy, or unavailable due to hardware faults or communication issues. This paper provides a robust focused comparative evaluation of seven traffic forecasting approaches: Persistence, Historical Average, ARIMA, Random Forest, LSTM, STGCN, and DCRNN. Experiments are conducted on the METR-LA and PEMS-BAY speed datasets using 5-minute data intervals, a 12-step historical input sequence, and a 12-step forecasting horizon. Under clean-data conditions, DCRNN achieves the best overall MAE on both datasets, with 3.548 mph on METR-LA and 1.905 mph on PEMS-BAY. However, when 40% random missing input corruption is introduced, STGCN shows greater robustness than DCRNN; for METR-LA, STGCN’s MAE increases by 27.0%, while DCRNN’s MAE increases by 34.5%. Under complete sensor-failure conditions, the model ranking changes further, with the LSTM baseline showing greater stability than both graph-based models on METR-LA. Graph ablation analysis also indicates that temporal modeling accounts for most of the forecast improvement, while the evaluated graph topology provides only limited additional benefits. These findings suggest that traffic forecasting models should be assessed not only by clean-data accuracy but also by their robustness under degraded sensing conditions before deployment in real intelligent transportation systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Enhanced Traffic Prediction Using Spatial–Temporal Graph Neural Networks

A Spatial-Temporal Graph Neural Network framework that can learn a combination of spatial and temporal relationships in road networks and changing time-varying patterns in traffic flow is used, which implies that adaptive spatial learning, together with the temporal sequence modeling, can produce much better forecasting stability.

Akarsh Kumar, Aishwarya Sinha, Yadvendra Pratap Singh · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Recurrent Graph Neural Network Hybrid Model for Spatio-Temporal Traffic Flow Prediction in Intelligent Transportation Systems

TETRA is proposed, a hybrid spatio-temporal traffic forecasting model that integrates Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) with Extended Long Short-Term Memory (xLSTM) to capture complex multi-timescale temporal patterns, including congestion propagation and delayed recovery dynamics, which are not well represented by conventional recurrent models.

Norman Bereczki, Vilmos Simon · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Traffic Flow Prediction System Based on Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Network

This framework introduces an adaptive graph learning module that dynamically infers meaningful connectivity relationships among traffic sensors—not relying on fixed geographic or distance-based assumptions—but instead leveraging real-time traffic correlations and node-level embeddings, enabling effective modeling of both localized spatial interactions and multi-scale temporal dependencies across varying prediction horizons.

Zhengxu Luan, Huan Wang, Miaobowen Wang et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Deep Ensemble-Based Spatiotemporal Traffic Forecasting Using Real-Time Urban Sensor Data

Accurate short-term traffic prediction is a critical component of intelligent transportation systems (ITS), yet it remains challenging due to nonlinear temporal dynamics, evolving spatial dependencies, and uncertainty in real-time urban traffic data. This paper proposes a novel uncertainty-aware deep ensemble spatiotemporal forecasting framework integrating Dynamic Graph Convolutional Networks (DGCN), Temporal Transformers, and CNN–LSTM hybrid models. A confidence-guided ensemble fusion strategy dynamically weights individual predictions using Bayesian uncertainty estimation. Experiments conducted on real-time Bhopal city traffic data demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving up to 90% performance gains during peak and abnormal traffic conditions.

Namrata Shrivastava, Jitendra Agrawal, Sandeep Raghuwanshi · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2025

Predicting Traffic Flow Using Attention and Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Networks

A prediction model that incorporates multiple attention mechanisms with spatiotemporal graph convolutional networks (HASTGCN) and designs a spatiotemporal map convolution module to collaboratively model the dynamic spatiotemporal connection of traffic flow collaboratively model is used.

Chu-xia Chen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

STGFormer: Spatio-Temporal Graph Transformer for Traffic Flow Prediction in Sparse-Sensing Scenarios

An improved Transformer prediction model that integrates a graph convolutional network (GCN) and a self-attention mechanism is proposed for traffic flow prediction, combining temporal self-attention and learnable temporal encoding to capture both long-term traffic evolution patterns and sudden fluctuations.

Jin Zhang, Feng-Min Tan, Wei Bai et al. · 0 citations