An algorithm for the special case of self-aware graphs, in which every vertex has a self-loop and a map whose fixed points yield sampling distributions that control the one-round regret remainder in terms of the learner's loss and the graph's independence number is constructed.
Abstract
We study first-order regret guarantees for adversarial bandits with a fixed, known directed feedback graph. For strongly observable graphs, [ACBDK15] establishes a minimax regret of $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{\alpha T})$, where $\alpha$ denotes the independence number of the graph and $T$ denotes the horizon. On the other hand, the best existing first-order bound scales as $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{(\kappa+1) L^\star})$ [LLZ20], where $\kappa$ denotes the clique partition number, satisfying $\kappa+1\geq\alpha$, and $L^\star$ denotes the cumulative loss of the best arm, leaving a gap between the graph dependence in worst-case and first-order guarantees. In this paper, we bridge this gap by obtaining an expected regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{\alpha L^\star}+\alpha)$. Our first result is an algorithm for the special case of self-aware graphs, in which every vertex has a self-loop. The algorithm combines the update of EXP3 [ACBFS02] with a sampling rule inspired by exploration by optimization [LS20]. More specifically, we construct a map whose fixed points yield sampling distributions that control the one-round regret remainder in terms of the learner's loss and the graph's independence number, which is crucial in deriving optimal first-order guarantees. We further show that a sufficiently accurate fixed point can be computed in polynomial time by a geometrically convergent iteration. Finally, we extend the algorithm to general strongly observable graphs and achieve the same $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{\alpha L^\star}+\alpha)$ guarantee by adapting the two-level aggregation approach of [LLZ20].
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.