Skip to content

Meshless Latent Dynamics Models for Model Order Reduction of time-dependent Partial Differential Equations

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 102 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

A unified mathematical framework for mesh-agnostic LDMs based on conditioning in Neural Fields (NeFs) is introduced, establishing a Universal Approximation Theorem (UAT) for this class of models and analyzing their stability by deriving Lipschitz bounds for different conditioning mechanisms.

Abstract

Latent dynamics learning has emerged as a prominent approach for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of time-dependent, parameterized Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). Traditional autoencoder-based approaches are intrinsically tied to fixed spatial discretizations during both training and inference, motivating the development of meshless methodologies. In this context, conditioning provides a natural mechanism for representing temporal evolution through spatially continuous functions, enabling mesh-agnostic Latent Dynamics Models (LDMs). In this work, we introduce a unified mathematical framework for mesh-agnostic LDMs based on conditioning in Neural Fields (NeFs). Leveraging a taxonomy of conditioning mechanisms (weak, strong, and pure), we formulate meshless LDMs as NeFs conditioned on a latent state. We establish a Universal Approximation Theorem (UAT) for this class of models and analyze their stability by deriving Lipschitz bounds for different conditioning mechanisms. Our analysis reveals an expressivity--stability trade-off, providing insight into why more expressive conditioning, despite its higher representational capacity, can potentially degrade performance during temporal extrapolation. Finally, we provide a comprehensive comparison of meshless and mesh-based architectures in the continuous limit of the spatial discretization, showing that meshless models guarantee grid-independent Lipschitz bounds, unlike mesh-based counterparts. Our experiments across Burgers'equation, Navier--Stokes flow past a cylinder, and linear advection show that meshless LDMs can achieve predictive accuracy comparable to or better than their mesh-based counterparts while using only 2% of the trainable parameters and exhibiting nearly constant error across spatial discretizations.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 3, 2026

Learn the rules: The hacker mindset

Research Manager Mike Walker reflects on a career spanning hacker culture, cybersecurity, and AI, sharing lessons about trust, teamwork, leadership, and why solving difficult problems requires curiosity, judgment, agility—and an understanding of the rules. The post Learn the rules: The hacker mindset appeared first on Microsoft Research.

Google DeepMind Blog Nov 3, 2026

Agentic cheminformatics with Google Antigravity

Learn how Google Antigravity and our Cheminformatics Skills accelerate drug discovery workflows, search compounds, and propose novel rigidified macrocycles.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.