Fracture modeling continues to be used to evaluate and design novel applications, and integration with diagnostics and other forms of field-data collection are crucial to success. In 2026, what is the state of hydraulic fracture modeling, and where are we headed? Fracture modeling is a core part of the engineering design workflow across much of the industry, both for conventionals and unconventionals. In unconventionals, fracture optimization with infill-well drilling remains a key focus. Fracture modeling continues to be used to evaluate and design novel applications. There is growing activity toward integrating fracture modeling with practical operational constraints. Real-time fracture optimization still has not taken off fully but remains an area of activity. Integration with diagnostics and other forms of field-data collection are crucial to success. In shale, the future is expected to be increasingly driven by new plays outside North America and enhanced oil recovery. Fracture modeling will be integral for both. When developing new plays, designs are less mature, and fracture modeling helps integrate data, evaluate alternatives, and shorten the learning curve. With enhanced oil recovery, either from surfactant or miscible injection, there is a merging of fracture modeling and reservoir engineering, because the fracture and reservoir closely affect each other. Enhanced geothermal systems have seen an explosion of interest in recent years, and this is another area where fracture modeling is closely linked with long-term modeling and reservoir engineering. As I review papers, one quibble would be that I wish more authors provided a detailed technical description of their approach. Often, it is unclear which equations were set up and solved, and so it is difficult to evaluate the reported results. Correspondingly, we see relatively fewer papers on the science of how to perform fracture modeling itself. There are notable exceptions, such as the innovative work being done on phase field modeling. It is too early to say how advances in artificial intelligence will affect fracture modeling. I hope we see more papers on this topic in the coming years.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60