Canada has an opportunity to learn from best practices in other jurisdictions to streamline reimbursement pathways and provide earlier, equitable access to new therapies for a greater number of patients, including specific access challenges associated with new dermatological treatments.
Abstract
Canadian patients must consistently wait an average of two years for public reimbursement of new medicines following their approval by Health Canada.1,2 While Canadian regulatory approval rates for new medications are comparable to those in other markets, Canada ranks among the slowest of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD20) countries in providing publicly funded reimbursement for these treatments.2 Access barriers and inequities also apply to public reimbursement of innovative therapiesin Canadian dermatology.3-5
Canada’s reimbursement landscape is complex and multi-layered, comprising both public and private elements. While private insurance plans may choose to cover new treatments immediately following approval by Health Canada, the same treatments must undergo a lengthy series of additional reviews by federal, provincial, and territorial agencies before becoming eligible for inclusion on public formularies.1 As a result, patients who depend on publicly reimbursed medications including seniors and lower income families, face significant disadvantages in accessing new therapies.6
Canada has an opportunity to learn from best practices in other jurisdictions to streamline reimbursement pathways and provide earlier, equitable access to new therapies for a greater number of patients.2,7 This article examines barriers to drug reimbursement in Canada, including specific access challenges associated with new dermatological treatments. It also reviews Canada’s current efforts to improve treatment access and describes strategies used in other jurisdictions that could be leveraged to facilitate more equitable patient access to innovative treatments for Canadian patients.
What Is the Issue?
Oncology medications can be broadly classified into treatments that are administered in a hospital and treatments that can be taken in the home setting.
In Canada, public drug plan reimbursement for oncology medication varies between federal, provincial, and territorial (FPT) jurisdictions, and d...
Cda-Amc· Canadian Journal of Health T...· 0 citations
This analysis presents a path forward for the expansion of VBC to promote orphan drug development, expand access to pharmaceuticals, and improve patient safety and explores different contracting options and paths for organizations like CMS and integrated payer-provider networks.
Urvisha Jain, Srinidhi Polkampally, Arnav Ajay Jadav et al.· Value in Health· 0 citations
328
Background:
Supportive care medications are central to oncologic outcomes, yet unlike antineoplastic agents protected under Medicare Part D's six protected-class rules, supportive care agents remain subject to plan-level formulary and utilization management policies without equivalent federal protection. Th...
Yi-Xin Tang, Charles Jiang, Chuan Angel Lu et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
Abstract Rare diseases are individually uncommon but collectively affect a substantial share of any population. The medicines developed for them combine severe conditions, very small treatable populations, high prices, and evidence that is often immature at launch. Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis handles this...
Ferit Sevim, Ç. E. Akyürek· European Journal of Public H...· 0 citations
Despite the Canada Health Act's emphasis on "reasonable access" to care, many newcomer patients for whom English is a second language face communication barriers when seeking medical treatment in Canada. This barrier is especially prevalent in Canadian pharmacies, where interpretation services are often limited or non-...
Josheil K. Boparai, Reem Hamud, Abby Pace et al.· Community Health Equity Rese...· 0 citations
29
Background:
The 340b Drug Pricing Program, originally intended to support safety net providers, allows qualifying providers to purchase drugs at a discounted price. Eligibility criteria and participation have continued to expand; notably, hospitals can qualify if they have a “disproportionate share” of Medic...
N. Galanter, Ziad Zakaria, Akriti Mishra Meza et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.