Skip to content
Open access

Smartwatch-based machine learning for the detection of cardiac dysfunction

Oct 2026 · European Heart Journal · Vol 47 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The cardiac dysfunction risk model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability and good calibration across internal and external cohorts, highlighting its potential to facilitate guideline-recommended early detection of asymptomatic heart failure, although further prospective validation in broader populations is warranted.

Abstract

Asymptomatic heart failure, a target for early intervention per guideline staging, is frequently missed without systematic screening. We aimed to develop a machine learning model based on smartwatch monitoring technology to screen individuals for cardiac dysfunction risk. In this prospective cohort study, we developed a real-time cardiac dysfunction risk model based on smartwatch monitoring technology. A total of 270 patients underwent synchronized acquisition of photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG) signals with smartwatch, with contemporaneous echocardiography as the golden standard for model labels between December 6, 2024 and November 11,2025 in a Chinese Hospital. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set (n = 198) and an internal validation set (n = 49). Cardiac dysfunction was defined as ejection fraction (EF) < 50%. Leveraging multimodal feature engineering in conjunction with SHAP feature importance analysis, we developed an XGBoost classifier for enhanced risk screening.The model was rigorously validated by its discriminative power (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC and AUC-PR), clinical utility (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV), calibration (calibration curve and Brier score), and generalizability (in an external cohort, n=93). The mean age was 55 ± 14 years (62.6% male) in the training cohort, 57 ± 14 years (53.1% male) in the validation cohort, and 47 ± 21 years (49.5% male) in the testing cohort; the corresponding mean ejection fractions (EFs) were 53.93 ± 13.12%, 55.51 ± 12.31%, and 53.88 ± 14.16%, respectively. The numbers (proportions) of participants with EF<50% were 64 (32.3%), 16 (32.7%), and 39 (41.9%) in the training, validation, and testing cohorts. The patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HF (NYHA I–II) accounted for 26.25%. Among 27 ECG features and 26 PPG features, QRS duration, QT interval and PPG velocity features were predominantly concentrated in the positive SHAP region, indicating a positive association with increased cardiac risk (Figure 1). The AUCs of cardiac dysfunction model were 0.99 in training cohort, 0.93 in internal validation cohort, and 0.95 in external cohort (Figure 2). The accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score reached 0.96, 0.94, 0.92, 0.98, and 0.93 in training cohort, respectively, while 0.87, 0.93, 0.74, 0.96, and 0.83 in external validation cohort, respectively. The cardiac dysfunction risk model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC 0.93–0.99) and good calibration across internal and external cohorts, highlighting its potential to facilitate guideline-recommended early detection of asymptomatic heart failure, although further prospective validation in broader populations is warranted.12

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

AI-ECG detection of diastolic dysfunction: A screening approach for early HFpEF

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is highly prevalent in the general population and represents an early stage of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Diagnosis relies on Doppler-based echocardiographic parameters, limiting its feasibility for large-scale screening. While artificial...

M. Soh, Y. Lee, H. Hong et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence-enabled detection of left ventricular hypertrophy using a single-lead electrocardiogram: a pilot study for wearable-based screening.

Single-lead ECG combined with demographic variables enables detection of electrocardiographic LVH with performance approaching that of 12-lead ECG models, supporting the feasibility of wearable-based screening pending validation against imaging-confirmed LVH.

Shahana Nandy, Sneha Nandy, Siddhartha R. Dalal · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

External validation of artificial intelligence–based electrocardiographic models for heart failure detection across diverse clinical settings

In up to 50% of patients, heart failure (HF) is first diagnosed at the time of hospitalization for acute HF, representing a missed opportunity for earlier treatment. Artificial intelligence–enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) offers a rapid and scalable opportunity for HF detection and risk stratification. Two...

A. Champetier, L. Chollet, K. Rumora et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Auscultation to Identify Left Ventricular Dysfunction - Development and External Validation in Prospective Multicenter Studies.

BACKGROUND Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) is common and associated with adverse prognosis, even in asymptomatic individuals. Early treatment improves outcomes, underscoring the need for efficient strategies to identify patients who may benefit from echocardiographic evaluation. This study aimed to develop and exter...

E. Sato, Y. Izumi, Y. Saito et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes using electrocardiography from overnight polysomnography.

Deep learning applied to nocturnal ECGs with sleep stage information captures cardiac abnormalities, offering a tool for cardiovascular risk stratification and integrating such prediction into PSG could enhance detection and support personalized clinical decision-making.

Z. Koscova, S. Nasiri, Matthew A. Reyna et al. · 0 citations

Prediction of Systolic Heart Failure from Real-World ECG Data

It is suggested that ECG models for systolic HF can be developed using ICD-based labels from routine clinical data, with model output associated with echo-derived LVEF, however, the performance decrease in external evaluation underscores the importance of careful interpretation and validation against imaging-derived en...

L. Graf, G. Riedemann, N. Spicher et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.