It is found that, in this benchmark, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a strong baseline, substantially improving argument language consistency and end-to-end function call accuracy and, under consistent model selection, SFT achieves performance comparable to, and sometimes exceeding more complex reinforcement learning (RL) approaches.
Abstract
The reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) for API calling degrades in multilingual settings. A common failure occurs when a model selects the correct tool but generates argument values in an inconsistent language, which we term Argument Language Mismatch (ALM). Although semantically correct, such outputs are operationally invalid and not captured by standard API-calling metrics. We revisit post-training strategies for mitigating ALM and find that, in our benchmark, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a strong baseline, substantially improving argument language consistency and end-to-end function call accuracy. Under consistent model selection, SFT achieves performance comparable to, and sometimes exceeding more complex reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. We further examine whether RL with structured, argument-aware rewards offers additional benefits. While methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) can improve language consistency and better preserve general reasoning ability, these gains are incremental and most pronounced in generalization and multi-objective trade-offs. Overall, our results suggest that much of the performance in multilingual API grounding can be achieved through careful supervised training, with RL providing targeted rather than fundamental improvements.
This work finds that likelihood-trained TPMs can result in failed generations due to overly large corrections to the LM’s logits, and trains TPMs with LM-aligned objectives that better align with the LM token-probability space.
Hanzhang Liu, William Zhao, Zilei Shao et al.· 0 citations
Pretrained language models (PLMs) have established state-of-the-art performance across diverse natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. This study reveals that seman-tic-rich explanations of lexical units can effectively guide PLM learning processes. We propose a novel language understanding enhancement method with token interpretation (LUETI) that addresses two critical limitations in conventional PLMs: Incomplete token semantics caused by isolated contextual learning and insufficient semantic encoding in embedding matrices. LUETI operates through dual mechanisms, augmenting token represen-tations by integrating hidden states with corresponding token interpretations and refining embedding spaces using interpretation-derived semantic vectors for token prediction. LUETI, which is implemented as a plug-in module for standard architectures, demonstrates significant improvements on BERT and GLM, achieving average performance gains of 3.36% and 4.87% respectively on the SuperGLUE benchmark with equivalent parameters and training data. Note that LUETI-equipped models attain comparable performance to baseline PLMs using only 60% of pretraining data. Findings establish token interpretation as a computationally efficient but semantically powerful enhancement strategy for language model pretraining.
Tianyi Chen, Yashen Wang, Huan Chang et al.· IEEE/CAA Journal of Automati...· 0 citations
This work introduces a new formulation of G-V consistency that involves a principled correction for utterance frequency, and shows that under a natural model of rational agents answering questions with multiple answers, consistency of the validator with a frequency-corrected generator score emerges naturally.
Juan Diego Rodriguez, Jocelyn Zhang, Katrin Erk et al.· 0 citations
A novel alignment framework, Reinforcement Learning for Selection Reward (RLSR), is proposed, which targets the area under the risk-coverage curve (AURC) -- a popular SP performance metric -- as its alignment objective and achieves substantially better risk-coverage trade-off compared to multiple alignment baselines on both in-domain and out-of-domain tasks.
Gaoxiang Luo, Yi-Fan Wu, Sinian Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Centroid Intervention Fusion is proposed, a projection fusion framework that consolidates multiple multilingual intervention projections into a single language-shared operator and outperforms the strongest prior pairwise intervention baseline by up to +3.3% across four model backbones.
This paper tests whether prompting the same (frozen) SLM in three typologically diverse languages and aggregating the outputs can improve classification without retraining or translation, and suggests that cross-lingual diversity rather than surface-level input variation drives the gain.
