For You, Not for Everyone: Bystander-Aware Delivery of Critical Feedback in Robot Tutoring
Atikkhan Faridkhan NilgarManuel DietrichKristof Van Laerhoven
Nov 2026
RoboticsHuman-computer Interaction
Abstract
Robots in shared settings may expose information intended for an individual user to nearby bystanders. Robot tutoring makes this concern particularly salient: critical feedback is directed at an individual learner, yet bystanders may overhear or see it. To address this, we compared context-invariant and context-adaptive robot behaviors in a between-subjects study with 40 participants. Following an initial phase without a bystander, a bystander entered the setting. Participants then received two scripted critical feedback messages concerning their pronunciation and handwriting, independent of their actual performance. With the context-invariant behavior, the robot tutor delivered both messages aloud. With the context-adaptive behavior, the robot tutor scanned for the bystander, turned its body and display away after detecting them, gave a spoken attention cue, and presented the same feedback messages silently on its display. Participants rated the robot tutor higher in perceived privacy awareness and perceived social competence in the context-adaptive condition than in the context-invariant condition, while evidence for reduced experienced embarrassment was inconclusive. These findings inform the design and evaluation of robots that respond to bystander presence by adapting how they communicate potentially sensitive information.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduNov 5, 2026
A new system identifies and corrects unreliable object descriptions stored in a robot’s memory, improving the robot’s ability to interact with its environment.