AVShift is introduced, the first German benchmark for systematically evaluating AV under multiple distribution shifts, and feature analysis reveals stylistic features that remain stable across genres, while their relative importance varies depending on the specific genre transition.
Abstract
Authorship verification (AV) assumes that an author's writing style remains sufficiently stable to distinguish it from that of other writers. In practice, however, this assumption is challenged by distribution shifts caused by changes in genre, time, and AI-assisted writing. Existing AV benchmarks typically study these factors in isolation and focus predominantly on English, limiting our understanding of model robustness under realistic conditions. We introduce AVShift, the first German benchmark for systematically evaluating AV under multiple distribution shifts. AVShift comprises over 150,000 text pairs spanning three genres and 21 years, enabling controlled evaluation of cross-genre, temporal, and AI-era shifts within a unified framework. We benchmark representative feature-based, embedding-based, and LLM-based approaches. Our experiments show that fine-tuned LLMs generalize best across genres and benefit substantially from stylistically diverse training data. We further demonstrate that temporal drift is one of the strongest factors affecting AV, with performance degrading significantly as the time gap between documents increases. In contrast, we find no evidence of a measurable AI-era distribution shift within AVShift. Finally, our feature analysis reveals stylistic features that remain stable across genres, while their relative importance varies depending on the specific genre transition. We release AVShift and our code for future research.
A hybrid approach that combines contextual embeddings from RoBERTa with handcrafted stylometric features to capture both high-level semantic patterns and low-level stylistic cues enables robust generalization across heterogeneous text types is adopted.
B. van Leeuwen, S. Bhulai, R. D. van der Mei· 0 citations
AuthBench is introduced, a large-scale multilingual benchmark for authorship representation that is designed to make this evaluation broad, standardized, and realistic, and position it not only as a new benchmark, but as a diagnostic resource for studying when and why authorship representations succeed or fail.
Mao-Xun Huang, Zhen-Xing Zhang, C. Cardie· 0 citations
PersonalBench is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates inference-time personalization methods through three independent lenses: LUAR (a trained authorship verification model), an LLM-as-judge, and automated stylometrics, which finds that personalization methods do produce author-differentiated output but this differen...
This work proposes HyperStyler, a novel architecture that decouples LAST into style selection and style realization, and demonstrates that HyperStyler consistently outperforms prior methods including LLM-based approaches and generalizes robustly across domains.
Jongkyung Shin, Minguk Jeon, Chanwoo Park et al.· 0 citations
The findings identify professional editing style as a key confounding variable in AI detector outputs, rather than establishing a full separation of text origin from linguistic style, raising concerns about fairness and reliability in academic settings.
Hyeonchu Park, Gahye Jeong, Bugeun Kim· 1 citation· ⚡1
Analysis of a large-scale dataset covering 234,073 research papers published between 2019 and 2025 suggests that AI-assisted writing confers a modest but systematic advantage in visibility and discoverability that translates into higher measured impact.
S. Paklina, P. Parshakov, Elena Rapoport· Scientometrics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.