Beyond Aggregate Sentiment: Machine Learning-Driven Discourse Indicators for AI News at Scale
TL;DR
Results show systematic variation across domains: technical and methodological areas such as deep learning and natural language processing exhibit gain-salient framing, while safety-critical topics such as deepfakes and facial recognition show strongly loss-salient profiles.
Abstract
This study deploys a scalable machine learning pipeline: combining a transformer-based classifier applied to 2.01 million English-language AI-related news headlines (July 2022–July 2024) with large-language-model and human-annotator validation (three annotators, Fleiss’ κ=0.80) on stratified subsamples, to extract six interpretable, bias-linked discourse indicators computed at the AI-domain level: evaluative orientation (valence), loss salience, narrative drift, exposure-adjusted sentiment, cross-source divergence, and novelty-phase framing. Each operationalizes an established cognitive-psychology construct as a computable property of the information environment associated with biased risk–benefit reasoning. Results show systematic variation across domains: technical and methodological areas such as deep learning and natural language processing exhibit gain-salient framing, while safety-critical topics such as deepfakes (loss-to-gain headline ratio = 3.17) and facial recognition show strongly loss-salient profiles. Cross-model validation using an LLM on a stratified sample of 1000 headlines confirms that domain-level indicator rankings are robust to classifier choice (Spearman ρ=0.83; p<0.001), establishing the rank stability of pipeline outputs independently of the specific classification architecture. As a contextual application, domain-level profiles are mapped to European Union AI governance instruments, documenting parallels between discourse patterns and regulatory risk tiers. The framework provides a scalable, reproducible methodology for monitoring evaluative conditions in technology news across domains, sources, and time.