Skip to content
Review Open access

Echocardiographic assessment of left atrioventricular coupling index: technical approaches and clinical implementation strategies

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · Vol 13 · 0 citations · 54 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Two-dimensional ultrasound is optimal for screening; RT-3DE shows highest consistency with cardiovascular magnetic resonance for precise diagnosis, and 3DE-LACI has demonstrated independent prognostic value in cardiac amyloidosis.

Abstract

Background The Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index (LACI) is an emerging echocardiographic parameter for assessing left atrial and ventricular diastolic function. While accumulating evidence supports its prognostic value, technical standardization for clinical implementation remains lacking. Methods This narrative review compares four LACI measurement approaches: two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE), speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. We evaluate technical characteristics, standardization challenges, and evidence gaps. Results Two-dimensional ultrasound is optimal for screening; RT-3DE shows highest consistency with cardiovascular magnetic resonance for precise diagnosis, and 3DE-LACI has demonstrated independent prognostic value in cardiac amyloidosis. STE aids mechanistic exploration but requires algorithmic standardization. AI demonstrates potential but needs multicenter validation. Key limitations include absent cross-platform calibration, fragmented reference values, and lack of externally validated cutoffs. Conclusion LACI is a promising marker of diastolic function with proven prognostic value; however, technical heterogeneity and inconsistent thresholds have hindered its clinical application. Future efforts should focus on cross-manufacturer standardization, the establishment of reference values for specific populations, and randomized controlled trials evaluating LACI as a guide for treatment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Overall, MAPSE has a clinically important role meriting integration into routine cardiac imaging and care, and demonstrated strong prognostic value, outperforming LVEF and global longitudinal strain in predicting adverse events in several studies.

Debbie Falconer, F. Fröjdh, N. Wyeth et al. · 2 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Routine echocardiographic measurements in clinical practice: reproducibility of left and right ventricular indices and agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance

Routine clinical practice, standard echocardiographic measurements showed overall good reproducibility, with the strongest performance for left ventricular indices.

Raúl Reyes-Toledo, D. G. David-Pardo, G. Lemus-Barrios et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Right Ventricular Strain Imaging: Present and Future

This review will provide methodology, normal reference values, and clinical applications of right ventricular global longitudinal strain, specifically for the Indian context, incorporating recent Indian studies across acute myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, cardiac surgery, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus.

Parminder Sharma, Arghadip Bose, Basant Kumar · 0 citations
Jul 2026

RACI: A Novel Prognostic Marker in Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

RACI is a novel parameter that effectively integrates RA and RV remodeling, and independently predicts all-cause mortality in functional TR, and incorporating RACI into clinical assessment may help with improving risk stratification and guiding the timing of intervention in patients with functional TR.

Robert S. Zhang, G. Falco, E. Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Myocardial Strain in Perioperative Medicine: A Practical Review for Anesthesiologists

A practical framework for the perioperative use of myocardial strain is provided by summarizing the current evidence, clarifying its methodological limitations, simplifying its acquisition and interpretation for non-expert users, distinguishing established clinical applications from future research directions, and identifying the key evidence gaps that must be addressed.

C. Beyls, F. Gonzalez, E. Donal et al. · 0 citations