Jul 2026· Journal of Clinical Pathology· pp. jcp-2026-210643· 0 citations· 44 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review provides a concise, practice-oriented overview of the two Food and Drug Administration-cleared AI tools for prostate biopsy interpretation: Paige Prostate Detect and Ibex Prostate Detect and examines their regulatory indications, diagnostic performance and integration requirements within digital pathology workflows.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct in surgical pathology, particularly in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, where variability in interpretation or missed cancer foci can significantly affect patient management. This review provides a concise, practice-oriented overview of the two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared AI tools for prostate biopsy interpretation: Paige Prostate Detect and Ibex Prostate Detect (formerly Galen Second Read). We examine their regulatory indications, diagnostic performance and integration requirements within digital pathology workflows. Emphasis is placed on real-world implementation considerations, including variation in technical inputs and the level at which data are analysed. We highlight less obvious risks, such as domain shift and the potential for inequitable performance in under-represented patient populations. Trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the context of AI-assisted pathologist assessments, are discussed using data from clinical validation studies. We also consider the variable impact of AI tools depending on the user’s expertise, noting enhanced diagnostic consistency for general pathologists. By highlighting both the opportunities and limitations of integrating AI into routine practice, we aim to provide pathologists with a pragmatic understanding of how these systems may influence diagnostic workflows and to emphasise that FDA clearance must be complemented by local validation as well as ongoing performance monitoring to ensure safe and equitable deployment.
This review summarizes the current state of AI applications in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of prostate cancer, highlighting recent advances and emerging opportunities in this ever-changing field.
Matthew S Lee, Chloe Shi, Tae-Hee Kim et al.· Clinical advances in hematol...· 0 citations
This narrative review synthesizes evidence across both cancers in imaging, digital pathology, molecular and liquid-biopsy data, and clinical applications and assesses deployment readiness and explains explainability without post hoc approximation.
D. Diamantidis, G. Tsakaldimis, Nikolaos Smyrlis et al.· Current Urology· 0 citations
The findings highlight the need for evidence from large, multicenter, prospective trials and evaluation frameworks that reflect the consequences of clinical decision-making, as well as further exploration of safeguards to monitor and address mismatches between training data and incoming scans during deployment.
Lisa Koopmans, Fernando Vega Lara, Christian Roest et al.· Abdominal Radiology· 0 citations
The present review analyzes the existing context of AI pathology systems, particularly diagnostic precision, clinical validation, and technical systems such as convolutional neural networks and transformers and discusses the integration challenge in clinical workflows for these systems.
Abdul-Mohsen G. Alhejaily, D. Alghamdi· Biomedical Reports· 0 citations
AI is emerging as a valuable adjunct in prostate biopsy evaluation, with the potential to enhance diagnostic precision, grading reproducibility, and personalized patient management, and challenges remain.
Current applications of AI in cancer diagnosis shows promise in identifying cancers and augmenting clinician performance, but challenges relating to deployment, bias, interpretability, accountability and real-world efficacy persist.
Arka Banerjee, D. Chia, K. Wong· British journal of hospital...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.