Skip to content
Preprint

Partial Homogeneity in Staggered Difference-in-Differences

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 39 references
Economics

Abstract

In staggered difference-in-differences (DiD) designs, units enter treatment at different calendar times, so the treatment effect is not a single number but a set of Cohort-Average Treatment effects on the Treated (CATTs), one per cohort-time cell. Estimating every CATT as its own parameter, as the standard fully flexible estimator does, is unbiased but inefficient when some of these effects are in fact equal, whereas pooling them all into a single two-way fixed effects (TWFE) coefficient is efficient but, whenever the heterogeneity is genuine, biased for the individual effects. We frame the choice between these extremes as a partition-selection problem on the cohort-time cells and address it with a Dirichlet Process (DP) mixture prior on the CATTs. The model favors parsimonious groupings without fixing their number, and a collapsed Gibbs sampler delivers point estimates, credible intervals that marginalize the unknown partition, and co-clustering probabilities for every pair of CATTs. With the error variance held fixed and a pairwise penalty placed on the partition, a maximum a posteriori (MAP) partition reduces to an $\ell_0$-penalized regression, connecting the Bayesian formulation to the homogeneity-pursuit literature. In a calibrated simulation, the model cuts the sampling variance of the cohort-time effects by 26--52\% relative to the fully flexible estimator, without the pooled estimator's bias, provided the distinct effects are separated enough to be recovered, and the posterior delivers near-nominal confidence-interval coverage by averaging over the unknown partition. In two applications the method recovers a precision-improving partial-homogeneity structure in one, where the cohort-time effects are genuinely heterogeneous, and reports that full pooling is adequate in the other, where they are not.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

Inference after data-driven control-unit selection in difference-in-differences with estimated covariance

In difference-in-differences (DiD), researchers may use pre-treatment trends to select a control group for which the parallel-trends assumption appears plausible, with the aim of estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Our earlier paper,Nakano and Hoshino (2016), and the present paper jointly prov...

Ryoya Nakano, Takahiro Hoshino · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Trading Scope for Credibility in Difference-in-Differences

When parallel trends fails for some treated cohorts but not others, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an average over all of them, is exactly the target that becomes hard to recover. We propose changing the estimand rather than defending it. The credible-subpopulation local ATT (LATT) is the effect for...

Parush Arora, Abhishek Chand · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Two Margins in Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment

This paper studies difference-in-differences with staggered adoption and a continuous, time-invariant dose. Each cohort-time comparison contains two margins. The level margin is the average treatment effect at realized doses. Under level parallel trends it equals the level contrast between the treated cohort and not-ye...

Fang Yu · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Panel Conditioning in Fixed-Effects Models: Identification and Bias Propagation

Panel conditioning, the causal effect of prior survey participation on responses, can vary with tenure. Under an additive model of cell means in period, entry cohort, and tenure, we characterize which features of the conditioning path a staggered panel identifies on its observed support, and how the unidentified compon...

Shoki Okubo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Distributional Difference-in-Differences: Aggregation Before or After Quantile Inversion?

Staggered distributional difference-in-differences produces cohort-specific potential-outcome distributions, but applied work typically wants one overall quantile treatment effect. Two natural summaries---averaging cohort quantile treatment effects (QTTs) and mixing cohort distributions before inversion---use the same...

Ulrich Hounyo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Aggregation Distortion in Multilevel Mediation: Estimand Geometry, Design Dependence, and Diagnostics

Researchers often summarize mediation in clustered data with a single-level product-of-coefficients estimator. We show what this pooled analysis estimates and why the target depends on the design. The pooled a-path is weighted by the within-between variance composition of the treatment. The pooled b-path uses a differe...

Subir Hait · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.