This work proposes a circuit-grounded framework that connects training-dynamics-based data valuation with mechanistic interpretability (MI), and conceptualizes data quality along three complementary utility axes, learnability, challenge, and alignment, establishing a principled white-box paradigm for interpretable data generation.
Abstract
While recent advances in data synthesis aim to curate high-quality datasets, most generation pipelines still rely on heuristic prompt-based control. This black-box paradigm provides limited insight into how individual samples interact with a model's underlying learning dynamics. To bridge this gap, we propose a circuit-grounded framework that connects training-dynamics-based data valuation with mechanistic interpretability (MI). Specifically, we conceptualize data quality along three complementary utility axes, learnability, challenge, and alignment. First, we uncover specialized model-internal circuits that causally govern these utility signals. Then, moving beyond heuristic prompting toward mechanistic control, we leverage these circuits as controllable interfaces, actively steering generation to produce utility-targeted data. Building on this capability, we introduce SAMS (Stage-Aware Mechanistic Scheduling), which schedules circuit-steered data according to the model's evolving optimization needs. Experiments on multiple-choice QA tasks demonstrate that our approach yields precisely controlled data with greater diversity than prompt-based baselines, consistently improving downstream performance and calibration. Ultimately, this work establishes a principled white-box paradigm for interpretable data generation, pioneering the use of MI not just as an analytical tool, but as a practical, controllable interface.
It is characterized that HRM is essentially implementing constraint-aware iterative refinement on a puzzle-specific solution state, in which the functional contributions of components at different levels vary without relying on a compact, causally important feature set.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks, from text summarization to question answering. Despite these capabilities, their black-box nature obscures internal decision-making processes. Mechanistic interpretability (MI) aims to address this by reverse-engineering neural...
Wendy Zheng, Yinhan He, Liang Wu et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that cellular perturbation atlases can instead become reinforcement-learning environments, where measured gene responses provide computable rewards for biological reasoning, and introduces PertMind, which combines trusted-trajectory supervised initialization with gene-, pathway-, and format-level reinforcem...
Zhen-Chao Tang, Xiao-Gang Xu, Jia-Fei Wu et al.· 0 citations
A verifier-guided neural-to-symbolic methodology for interpretable and physically auditable forecasting in the natural sciences is established, establishing a verifier-guided neural-to-symbolic methodology for interpretable and physically auditable forecasting in the natural sciences.
An AI-driven framework treating model dynamics as learnable signatures is introduced, using deep learning autoencoders to embed the dynamic signatures of thousands of competing models into a low-dimensional latent space and provides a rigorous, full-state alternative to scalar metrics.
Mustafa Ozen, Chaitra Agrahar, Francesca Zappa et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This review examines emerging AI methodologies for accelerated materials discovery, with particular emphasis on how computational design, data infrastructure, synthesis planning, and autonomous experimentation can be connected into experimentally grounded workflows.
Jaehwan Choi, Seongmin Kim, Junkil Park et al.· Chemical Reviews· 4 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 14, 2026
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.