Endocrine Disruptors and Gynecological Malignancies
TL;DR
Evidence supports EDC contributions to gynecological malignancy through convergent pathways, though causal inference remains constrained by observational epidemiology, long latency periods, and challenges in characterizing real-world mixture exposures.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with hormonal homeostasis and have been implicated in gynecological malignancy pathogenesis. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence regarding EDC exposure and breast, endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancers, examining molecular mechanisms, epidemiology, and diagnostic and clinical implications. Methods: We conducted a literature review using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through April 2026, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, prospective cohorts, case-control studies, and mechanistic investigations examining EDC-cancer associations. Methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and AMSTAR-2, with overall certainty of evidence rated using the GRADE framework. Results: Major EDC classes—bisphenol compounds, phthalates, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—demonstrate carcinogenic potential through estrogen receptor modulation, epigenetic alterations, oxidative stress, and oncogenic signaling disruption. Breast cancer shows the strongest evidence, with prenatal and early-life DDT/DDE exposure associated with up to a 3.7-fold increased risk. Endometrial cancer demonstrates associations with xenoestrogen mixtures exhibiting non-monotonic dose-responses, whereas ovarian and cervical cancers show emerging but limited associations. Common mechanisms include receptor crosstalk, epigenetic dysregulation with transgenerational effects, oxidative genomic instability, metabolic reprogramming, and cancer stem cell enrichment. Conclusions: Evidence supports EDC contributions to gynecological malignancy through convergent pathways, though causal inference remains constrained by observational epidemiology, long latency periods, and challenges in characterizing real-world mixture exposures. Diagnostic and prevention strategies should integrate EDC exposure into risk-prediction models, leverage multi-omics biomarkers for early detection, and emphasize exposure reduction during critical developmental windows alongside regulatory reform.