Skip to content
#small language model Book Open access

FAIR-PIVOT: Fairness-oriented Perspective-Inversion via Viewpoint-balanced Outline-then-generaTion for Mitigating Political Bias in Web Corpora

Nov 2026 · Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · 0 citations · 18 references

TL;DR

Fairness-oriented Perspective-Inversion via Viewpoint-balanced Outline-then-generaTion (simply, FAIR-PIVOT), a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based two-level-agent framework that builds balanced perspective-inverted synthetic data for politically sensitive topics is proposed.

Abstract

Large-scale web corpora (e.g., C4) are severely imbalanced in terms of political perspective: on the death penalty issue, e.g., left-leaning documents outnumber right-leaning ones by more than 8-fold. Such imbalances can transfer to downstream large language models, reinforcing political bias. We propose Fairness-oriented Perspective-Inversion via Viewpoint-balanced Outline-then-generaTion (simply, FAIR-PIVOT), a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based two-level-agent framework that builds balanced perspective-inverted synthetic data for politically sensitive topics. After annotating web texts with multi-persona LLMs, FAIR-PIVOT retrieves documents from contrasting orientations and inverts their viewpoint, preserving authentic discourse structure rather than rephrasing the same-view text. Across nine topics, FAIR-PIVOT generates 13,954 instances and reduces the total variation distance, a measure of how far the orientation distribution deviates from uniform balance, by up to 83%, while improving linguistic fluency as measured by Perplexity (25.5 → 21.8 ↓). Fine-tuning small language models on the balanced corpus further shifts their downstream behavior toward the intended orientation (Gemma (L--R)% +48 → +34, Qwen +55 → +50), confirming that data-level balancing can yield fairer model responses. Code and scripts are available at https://github.com/bigbases/FAIR-PIVOT.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

CoR-Hate: counterfactual retrieval and fairness-regularized hate-speech detection

The growing presence of hate speech on social media, targeting groups based on race, religion, gender, and sexual orientation, raises critical concerns regarding fairness and reliability in automated moderation systems. This study introduces CoR-Hate, a fairness-regularized framework that integrates Sentence-Transf...

Ehtesham Hashmi, J. Mccrae, Sule Yildirim Yayilgan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

BiasScope: Inference-Time Bias Detection and Mitigation for Fair Natural Language Processing (NLP) Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Prompt Engineering

BiasScope is a lightweight framework that uses prompt engineering and RAG to detect and mitigate model biases at inference time without changing weights, and provides an effective means of achieving fairness and accountability in production Natural Language Processing (NLP).

Rakeshkumarreddy Ambati · 2 citations
Open access Nov 2026

Uncovering Default Gender Biases in Publicly Accessible LLMs Through Counter-Balancing Cloze-Task (CBCT)

As large language models (LLMs) become ubiquitous in professional, educational, and creative workflows, ensuring demographic neutrality is critical. However, commercial conversational models are heavily shielded by top-level safety alignment filters that obscure implicit biases. This study investigates latent gender bi...

Faouzi Adjed, Lucas Schott, Lucas Mattioli et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Sep 2026

One Example Is Enough to Pass Fairness Benchmarks: Rethinking Fairness Evaluation for Aligned LLMs

It is argued that BBQ-style multiple-choice abstention benchmarks measure a single structural cue, and a model that solves them does not thereby become fair, and is called for evaluation suites that cover a broader spectrum of fairness alignment.

Nai-Hao Deng, Samee Arif, Shuai-Chen Chang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Where Does Rhetorical Distortion Live? A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Measurement of Influencer Content

Much of the manipulation in influencer content is not false but disproportionate, framing accurate facts as historic, urgent, or catastrophic. Existing approaches either verify factual claims or detect clickbait and propaganda in single-platform, single-language text; however, they overlook where such framing originate...

Xu-Chen Yu, Jiang-Ping Chen, Hao-Han Wang · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Nov 10, 2026

Decision Models in Hugging Face

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.