Aug 2026· IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence· Vol PP· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
This work introduces Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding (PopCD), a test-time behavior control method that generalizes contrastive decoding to broader enhancement settings and is applicable to both LLMs and Vision-Language Models without additional training.
Abstract
Reliable AI systems require large language models (LLMs) to exhibit behaviors aligned with human preferences and values. However, most existing alignment approaches operate at training time and rely on additional high-quality data, incurring significant computational and annotation costs. While recent work has shown that contrastive decoding can leverage a model's internal distributions to improve specific capabilities, its applicability remains limited to narrow behavioral scopes and scenarios. In this work, we introduce Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding (PopCD), a test-time behavior control method that generalizes contrastive decoding to broader enhancement settings. PopCD constructs paired positive and negative guiding prompts for a target behavior and contrasts model responses-specifically token-level probability distributions in LLMs and visual attention patterns in VLMs-to reinforce desirable outcomes. This formulation extends contrastive decoding to a wide range of enhancement objectives and is applicable to both LLMs and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) without additional training. For LLMs, experiments on the "3H" alignment objectives (helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness) demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements, indicating that post-trained models can achieve meaningful self-enhancement purely at test time. For VLMs, we further analyze contrastive effects on visual attention, showing that PopCD significantly improves VQA performance by reinforcing behavior-consistent visual grounding. Collectively, these results highlight PopCD as a simple, general, and cost-efficient strategy for reliable behavior control across modalities.
An integrated conceptual frame-work that couples attention- and perturbation-based explainability with lightweight hallucination-detection signals and token-efficient inference strategies is presented, and a set of cross-cutting consistency metrics are instrumented with a set of cross-cutting consistency metrics.
Sakshi Parate, Shreyans Sanyal· Advanced International Journ...· 0 citations
By thoroughly unifying 36 English hate speech datasets spanning multiple labeling schemes, this work fine-tune a generalist LLM, based on Qwen3 (Qwen Team, 2025), specifically for hate speech mitigation, demonstrating not only state-of-the-art performance on in-domain benchmarks but also substantial improvements in cro...
Lukas Edman, Daryna Dementieva, Alexander Fraser· 0 citations
EviSI, a large language model evaluation agent combining Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) with criteria developed with professional interpreters, is proposed, showing positive system ranking correlations with COMET throughout.
Ben Yan, Zong-Yao Li, Xiao-Yu Chen et al.· 0 citations
IGFD is proposed, a training-free decoding strategy that ranks candidates using token confidence, neighborhood uncertainty, and structural commitment risk and consistently outperforms existing decoding strategies across the majority of benchmarks and diffusion MLLM backbones under identical decoding budgets.
Xing-You Fang, Jin Zhong, Xiaosong Yuan et al.· 0 citations
This work finds that likelihood-trained TPMs can result in failed generations due to overly large corrections to the LM’s logits, and trains TPMs with LM-aligned objectives that better align with the LM token-probability space.
Hanzhang Liu, William Zhao, Zi-Lei Shao et al.· 0 citations
The current robustness fine-tuning methods improve over standard fine-tuning and in-context learning, but the best-to-worst prompt gap remains as high as 40-57% of performance, and recent robustness-enhancing methods often fail to outperform the simplest data construction strategy: training on one template per batch.
Frederic Sadrieh, Michal Štefánik· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.