Understanding end-user contexts and identifying design preferences of an artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support tool for early autism detection
This study evaluates the context for clinical decision support (CDS) deployment and identifies design preferences, which will inform the design of an AI-based CDS tool for autism detection, providing workflow-informed integration points and user preferences.
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Building on innovations for autism detection—where artificial intelligence (AI)-based models monitor clinical data within electronic health records—this study evaluates the context for clinical decision support (CDS) deployment and identifies design preferences. Materials and Methods This observational study utilized contextual inquiry to elicit perspectives from 8 clinicians and twenty caregivers during 18- to 24-month well-child visits at Duke-affiliated clinics. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis techniques. Results Workflow analysis identified 6 user tasks, 3 technology-user interactions, and 5 clinical decision points. Technologies that streamlined screening included patient portals, digital tablets, and note templates. Clinicians identified 2 major barriers—limited screening tool accuracy and challenges in implementing follow-up steps—and 3 facilitators: electronic screening, early intervention provider input, and staff referral coordination support. For design, CDS should include clear, actionable outputs, with explanations of prediction data, visual summaries linked to next steps, and educational resources. Embedding CDS within the EHR, with outputs delivered at key points during the clinical encounter, along with caregiver-facing materials, would improve workflow efficiency. Discussion Findings highlight key integration points for an autism detection AI-based CDS tool and stress the need for clinical utility and caregiver-centered communication. Effective design requires alignment with clinical workflow, including the timing of outputs, meaningful explanations, and integration with caregiver communication. Conclusion Findings will inform the design of an AI-based CDS tool for autism detection, providing workflow-informed integration points and user preferences. Future work should refine explainability and optimize delivery of outputs within clinical encounters to support decision-making and caregiver engagement.
Machine learning can support diagnosticians in this effort, as demonstrated here utilizing multiple rating scales, the TASI, and the TAP, but there is a risk for bias when using machine learning and as such, no algorithm should replace expert clinical judgment.
Aaron J. Kaat, Ashlynn Campagna, Hannah Feiner et al.· JCPP Advances· 0 citations
SIT-CARE, a CDSS, which provides AI-based recommendations and data visualizations of clinically relevant nonverbal behavior for ASC assessment demonstrated potential in improving initial diagnostic assessments, supporting in-depth diagnosis and empowering less experienced clinicians.
U. Schäfer, William Saakyan, Matthias Norden et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Evaluated ASIST (Autism Screening With Intelligent Supportive Technology), an AI-powered conversational platform designed to support structured history taking and referral preparation for adults seeking to explore autistic traits, suggests AI-powered conversational tools may offer scalable solutions for structured hist...
Shabnam Sadeghi Esfahlani, Louise Prothero, N. Abdulmohdi et al.· JMIR Formative Research· 0 citations
Carers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators influencing engagement with paper- and AI-based assessment tools were explored, finding engagement depended on individual capabilities, available opportunities and motivation; factors fundamental to successful uptake.
Labhpreet Kaur, A. Griffiths, Louis Stokes et al.· Journal of Geriatric Psychia...· 0 citations
This structured narrative review examines selected decentralized domains—neonatal jaundice, autism-related screening or assessment, and cry or sleep monitoring—in children from birth through six years and tests whether multimodal fusion improves clinically relevant decisions over matched unimodal baselines and whether...
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) remain a critical public health challenge, with long-term effects on physical health, mental well-being, and socioeconomic outcomes. Despite ongoing trauma-informed care (TIC) initiatives, existing systems lack integrated, real-time data analytics and accessible decision-support too...
Mohmmad Arif Shaik, Andrea Meyer Stinson, Audrey Idaikkadar et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.