Aug 2026· Nature Communications· Vol 17· 2 citations· 62 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is shown that AI-discovered strategies propagate and persist in human populations, producing cultural shifts when non-trivial, learnable, and advantageous.
Abstract
Intelligent machines have the potential to uncover problem-solving strategies beyond human discovery. Emerging evidence from competitive gameplay, such as Go and chess, demonstrates that AI systems are evolving from mere tools to sources of cultural innovation adopted by humans. However, the conditions under which intelligent machines transition from tools to drivers of persistent cultural change remain unclear. We identify three key dimensions that modulate machine influence on human problem-solving: the discovered strategies must be non-trivial, learnable, and offer a clear advantage. Using a cultural transmission experiment, we demonstrate that when these conditions are met, machine-discovered strategies can be transmitted, understood, and preserved by human populations, leading to enduring cultural shifts. Conversely, using agent-based simulations, we show how machine influence is constrained in the absence of these conditions. These findings provide a framework for understanding how machines can persistently expand human cognitive skills and underscore the need to consider their broader implications for human cognition and cultural evolution. AI can uncover problem-solving strategies beyond human discovery. Here, the authors show that AI-discovered strategies propagate and persist in human populations, producing cultural shifts when non-trivial, learnable, and advantageous.
How do humans and artificial agents learn to act in a world whose rules they do not yet know? We use LS20, a novel ARC-AGI-3 game, as an artificial world: a microcosm whose mechanics must be discovered through exploration and improvisation alone. We operationalise a methodological loop: observe how humans explore, adap...
Andrei C. Aioanei, Syeda Khushbakht Batool, Alexander Aston et al.· IEEE Symposium on Artificial...· 0 citations
This article introduces a framework for designing and running simulated experiments with LLM‐powered agents and applies the framework to the exploration–exploitation dilemma and shows that LLM‐based experiments reproduce patterns observed among human participants.
This primer draws on fieldwork in a computational biology laboratory to examine what human oversight of AI agents requires in practice and shows that effective oversight has four components: adequate knowledge of system capabilities and limitations, sufficient observation of system actions, meaningful control of system...
An analysis that derives task-specific algorithmic design spaces from human-designed methods, maps both human- and agent-designed methods into these spaces, and quantifies their algorithmic differences at the module level suggests that although current agents can occasionally match or surpass human SOTA performance, th...
Yikang Yang, Zhengxin Yang, Luzhou Peng et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that chess provides a useful bridge between cognitive and computational perspectives on strategic reasoning, and identifies explicit planning, grounded and faithful explanation, metacognitive calibration, and human--AI complementarity as directions for future research.
A constructive, artificial-life approach that treats LLMs as model organisms investigating the emergent mechanisms of cognitive functions through biological adaptive evolution rather than static analysis is proposed, as a step toward understanding the human-AI societies now taking form.