A general framework to define quantum circuit architecture witnesses, which certify the incompatibility of a unitary transformation with a specified quantum circuit architecture, and exploit the stabiliser formalism to reduce the construction to linear programming.
Abstract
Determining whether a target unitary can be implemented within a prescribed quantum circuit architecture is a fundamental problem in quantum information, with direct implications for optimisation and compilation of quantum circuits, and hardware-efficient quantum computation. While existing synthesis and compilation methods are primarily constructive, they generally do not provide rigorous certificates that a unitary cannot be realised using given implementation resources. Here we introduce a general framework to define quantum circuit architecture witnesses, which certify the incompatibility of a unitary transformation with a specified quantum circuit architecture. We formulate the witness construction as a semidefinite program by maximising the fidelity between the Choi state of the target unitary and those of tested circuits. The resulting witnesses provide practical and quantitative certificates of incompatibility, implying lower bounds on implementation resources such as the gate count or circuit depth, and can also be used experimentally to benchmark quantum devices by certifying that an implemented unitary channel goes beyond the capabilities of a given circuit architecture. For Clifford unitaries, we exploit the stabiliser formalism to reduce the construction to linear programming, enabling both more efficient numerical certification for circuits containing on the order of seven two-qubit gates, and analytical witnesses for some families of architectures made of an arbitrary number of gates.
Here it is shown that minimized expressions retain algebraic structure minimization cannot reach, arising from containment and complementary-polarity relationships among their terms, and that extracting it yields circuits cheaper to execute despite having more operations.
Mehul A. Shah, Robert Fiszer, M. Perkowski· 0 citations
This paper presents an algorithm that converts a circuit containing a sequence of CNOT gates into a form that is suitable for arbitrary quantum computer architectures, and demonstrates the algorithm only in the context of quantum fingerprinting.
K. Khadiev, A. Khadieva, Vadim Sagitov et al.· 0 citations
A Clifford+T quantum circuit construction that approximately implements any classically specified unitary to within error $\epsilon$ and achieves a worst-case $T$-count with leading exponential scaling of $2^{5n/4}$ whenever $\log(1/\epsilon)=\operatorname{poly}(n)$.
Dynamic quantum circuits (DQCs) provide a hardware-efficient route to quantum computing by reducing physical-qubit overhead and compressing circuit topology through mid-circuit measurements, qubit reset and reuse, and classical feed-forward control. Here, we demonstrate the advantages of DQCs on a single hybrid superco...
Hongbo Wu, Ling Hu, Jiasheng Mai et al.· 0 citations
Encoding classical data into quantum systems is a foundational step in the execution of nearly all quantum algorithms, and a critical bottleneck in realizing practical quantum advantage. This review provides a comprehensive account of the concepts, algorithms, and practical considerations associated with quantum data e...
Xiao-Ming Zhang, Arthur G. Rattew, Bu-Jiao Wu et al.· 2 citations
This work contributes to establishing some methodological principles towards realizing a high-level quantum structured programming by addressing a conceptual framework following the notion of the whole quantum computation as a structure composed of quantum registers representing each an undivided entity.
David Chamizo, José García-Alonso, J. M. Murillo· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.