Skip to content
Preprint

MMArt: A Multi-Perspective Multimodal Dataset for Visual Art Understanding

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

MMArt is introduced, a large-scale dataset of 74,234 WikiArt paintings, each annotated with four independently annotated perspectives plus a harmonized unified caption, produced by specialized vision-language models or human annotation and validated through complementary quality evaluations.

Abstract

Recent vision-language models demonstrate impressive general visual understanding, yet their art interpretation remains shallow: they describe surface content but struggle with formal analysis, grounded historical interpretation, or affective characterization. We argue this is not only a model but also a dataset limitation. Existing art datasets are single perspective resources, where no dataset provides narrative, formal, emotional, and historical perspectives simultaneously for the same artworks. We introduce MMArt, a large-scale dataset of 74,234 WikiArt paintings, each annotated with four independently annotated perspectives plus a harmonized unified caption, produced by specialized vision-language models or human annotation and validated through complementary quality evaluations. Two complementarity analyses establish that perspectives encode genuinely distinct information. A generative analysis shows that formal analysis descriptions best preserve compositional style, and historical descriptions carry strong affective signal in reconstructed images. A discriminative retrieval analysis reveals task-asymmetry: narrative descriptions drive retrieval (R@1 = 44.0%), while formal descriptions, strongest for reconstruction, are nearly nondiscriminative at retrieval scale (R@1 = 7.8%). Leave-one-out analysis further confirms that historical descriptions are the least replaceable perspective across both tasks. Together, the two analyses establish that no single perspective suffices for all tasks, directly motivating MMArt multi-perspective design. The dataset, code, and additional information are available at https://shuaiwang97.github.io/MMArt/.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Learning visual representations for compositional analysis of artworks and photographs

This work compares two parallel paradigms for composition analysis: a human-inspired method grounded in perceptual grouping, and fine-tuned foundation models enabled by recent large-scale compositional datasets.

F. Behrad, T. Tuytelaars, Johan Wagemans · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Abstract4D: A Large-Scale Dataset and Framework for Understanding the Visual Language of Abstract Art

This work analyzes the semantic structure of abstract art through large-scale embedding visualization, uncovering how perceptual relationships organize artistic meaning, and establishes benchmark tasks for classification, cross-modal retrieval, and text-to-image generation to evaluate how AI models perceive and reprodu...

Hao-Wei Zhang, Yuanpei Zhao, Ji-Zhe Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An Automated Artistic Image Aesthetic Evaluation Framework via Expert Knowledge Injection into Large Vision-Language Models

The proposed AEKI framework translates formal art principles into structured, machine-executable instructions and indicates that domain knowledge can be incorporated into LVLM evaluation through a transparent rule-based layer, supporting applications in digital curation, computational aesthetics, and art education.

Bo-Zhi Zhang, Ming-Xing Shao, Tiancheng Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.

Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.

Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.