Skip to content
Preprint

All four leading LLMs talk more than they listen to personality-verified synthetic help-seekers

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 71 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly consulted at moments of distress, yet single-turn benchmarks neither test sustained exchanges nor distinguish between users. We built a personality-aware evaluation in which four widely used models advised several synthetic help-seekers, each given a psychometrically specified profile, in an acute crisis: a caregiver learning of a relative's dementia diagnosis. Auditors blind to the profile prompt recovered the specified bands from dialogue alone with high agreement on every instrument (ICC(2,4) = 0.91; 0.79-0.96 by instrument; band-score r = 0.78), as expected for the Big Five but equally for coping style, coping self-efficacy, resilience and reactance, which the lexical approach never covered. Such evaluation therefore reaches beyond the Five Factor Model to motivational, regulatory and self-appraisal dispositions. The four models were not distinguishable on emotion stabilisation and failed alike, sharing three modes: verbosity, a talk-to-listen ratio above one, and problem-solving before the situation had been explored.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

From Minds to Models: The Intersection of Psychology and LLM Behaviours

Large language models (LLMs) are often compared with the human mind because their decision-making is complex, non-linear and difficult to interpret. Psychological methods developed to investigate unobservable mental processes may therefore help examine LLM behaviour, particularly in government and healthcare. Building...

Oliver A. Guidetti, Reza Ryan · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

When the Prompt Speaks Louder than the Person: Output Anchoring in Personality-Informed LLM Emotional Support for Drivers

This Work-in-Progress examines whether personality-informed prompting changes perceived LLM emotional support in driving scenarios designed to elicit stress. A condition-order-balanced, within-subject CARLA simulator study (n = 14) compared a baseline with a Driver Personality Profile (DPP) condition; a supplementary o...

Max Mittelstädt, Ece Sutanrikulu, Lumbardh Ljatifi et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

CompanionBench: A Theory-Anchored, Real-World-Grounded Benchmark for AI Emotional Companionship

CompanionBench, an interactive bilingual benchmark to ground both its scenarios and a trained user simulator in de-identified real-world data, and is the first companion benchmark to ground both its scenarios and a trained user simulator in de-identified real-world data.

Yaopei Liu, Guang-Jia Chai, Yu-Ming Huang et al. · 2 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Aug 2026

Move by Move: Measuring and Steering How LLMs Conduct Psychotherapy

Users increasingly turn to large language models for emotional support, yet little is known about how these models actually conduct a psychotherapy interaction. We introduce an ontology of ten therapeutic moves: compact, function-based categories grounded in the MULTI-60 inventory, validated through an annotation campa...

Afonso Baldo, Hugo Pitorro, Areti Vassilopoulos et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

EmoS: A Theory-Grounded Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Emotional Intelligence in Spoken Language Models

EmoDialogue, a bilingual dataset providing necessary fine-grained supervision through response pairs with rigorously defined EI gradations, and EmoS, a specialized evaluator model optimized via Supervised Fine-Tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization, are introduced, establishing a foundational framework for advan...

Junyu Wang, Si-Yuan Zhang, Peiyuan Jiang et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.