FinDeepIndicator is proposed, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating Deep Research agents in end-to-end financial indicator construction, and covers fundamental, technical, and macroeconomic indicators organized into 21 fine-grained sub-categories.
Abstract
Financial indicators are essential tools for transforming raw financial data into interpretable measures for various downstream tasks, such as valuation, risk assessment, and economic analysis. However, existing financial benchmarks largely focus on answer-level accuracy and often assume that relevant data are already provided, leaving the assessment of the intermediate process of indicator construction underexplored. In this work, we propose FinDeepIndicator, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating Deep Research (DR) agents in end-to-end financial indicator construction. Specifically, FinDeepIndicator evaluates DR agents across four stages in indicator construction: formula specification, data collection, indicator calculation, and answer generation, and covers fundamental, technical, and macroeconomic indicators organized into 21 fine-grained sub-categories. It contains 3,350 curated question-answer (QA) pairs derived from both U.S. and Chinese markets, 10 years of historical financial data, and 800 listed companies. Extensive experiments on search-equipped Large Language Models (LLMs) and DR agents show that, while LLMs generally perform well in formula specification, their accuracy drops substantially during data retrieval and numerical execution. DR agents consistently outperform search-equipped LLMs, yet remain unreliable in realistic financial analysis settings. These findings provide insights for developing more capable and trustworthy DR agents in finance.
QFRS underpins a public state-of-the-art leaderboard, ensuring that only studies satisfying these standards are ranked, with the goal of shifting the literature from opaque, error-metric-driven results to transparent, economically meaningful and comparable benchmarks.
M. Khushi· Artificial Intelligence Revi...· 1 citation
Evaluating FrontierFinance, a fully open benchmark of 220 expert-crafted queries and 11,543 source-attributed rubrics spanning six crucial use cases across the full investor workflow, finds that the tool harness, not the model alone, strongly shapes quality and efficiency.
Yuhao Zhang, O. Koyluoglu, Thejas Venkatesh et al.· 3 citations· ⚡2
This thesis uses a cheap, off-the-shelf measure of Environmental, Social and Governance content in financial text by monitoring the internal activations of frozen, out-of-the-box LLMs and finds that these methods come close to fully fine-tuned models without any task-specific fine-tuning.
FinanceHarness is presented, a harness that runs finance-oriented tools and practitioner-guided workflows, automating financial deep research end to end: environment and data construction, the agent execution loop, and reward modeling, and FinanceGym, comprising thesis-driven research questions and rubrics that combine...
FinBench is presented, a benchmarking framework designed to support reproducible evaluation of stock market prediction models using heterogeneous financial data and provides a practical reference for systematic and reproducible comparison of stock market prediction methods.
Sara Pederzoli, Marta Santacroce, Francesco Guerra et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
AnalysisBank is proposed, which distills expert reports into a reusable library of Analyses, each pairing a data signal, an analytical move, and the expert span it was derived from, to operate at the analytical rather than structural level of financial report generation.
Ya-Jing Yang, Yun-Shan Ma, Kelvin J. L. Koa et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.