Infinite-width limits are a standard way to reason about neural networks, but it is not automatic that the limiting learner has the same complexity-theoretic inductive bias as large finite networks. We study this question for Bayesian neural networks at the mean-field, or critical feature-learning, scaling. The central quantity is the \emph{reduced entropy} \[ s_\infty(y,\varepsilon)=\limsup_N -\frac{1}{N}\log \pi_N^0(L\le \varepsilon), \] the intensive prior cost of representing a target function $y$ to population mean-squared error $\varepsilon$. Our main result is a width-robust learnability theorem. At fixed depth, a family of Boolean-cube targets is learnable from polynomially many samples at infinite width if and only if it is learnable at polynomial width, if and only if its reduced entropy is polynomially bounded. Equivalently, up to polynomial slack in accuracy, the Bayesian mean-field learner generalizes exactly on the targets that can be represented by polynomial-size networks. The forward direction is proved by a form of subsampling: from the infinitely many hidden neurons in the mean-field solution, one can select polynomially many representatives and still preserve the learned function on every input simultaneously. At the critical scaling this subsampling has both an ``active''component, which keeps the data-dependent low-dimensional statistics, and a ``lazy''component, which resamples the entropy-dominated directions from the prior. Thus the infinite-width mean-field limit gives a clean analytic description of learning without introducing spurious width-dependent generalization power.
The lifted-selector reduction has an inverse-polynomial radial gap, proved through a quantitative theorem for rational cyclic zonogons, and the results apply to Euclidean zonotope radius and positive-semidefinite binary quadratic maximization parameterized by rank.
Pahan Dewasurendra, Subhashini Jayawardhana· 1 citation
Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints ($d_{DS}/n$ realizable, $\sqrt{d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n$ agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk $L^\star$, the optimal excess risk is $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{L^\star d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n)$, uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither $L^\star$ nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-$k$ compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator $h$ has population risk at most $L(h)+O(\sqrt{L(h)\Gamma}+\Gamma)$ with $\Gamma=(k\log n+\log(1/\delta))/n$, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed $L^\star$, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to $L^\star$ and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best $r$-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor $r$ from the known realizable list lower bound.
Xiaoyu Li, Andi Han, Jiaojiao Jiang et al.· 1 citation
A quasipolynomial-time learner for $\mathsf{AC}^0$ under graphical models that admit efficient local samplers, circumventing the polynomial-growth requirement in prior work.
Weiming Feng, Xiongxin Yang, Yixiao Yu et al.· 0 citations
It is proved that characteristic functions of traceable subsets of traceable subsets of $[-1/2,1/2]^n$ can be approximated in L^p to accuracy $\varepsilon>0$ by ReLU neural networks of size $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-p(n-1)/m})$, with depth independent of $\varepsilon$ and polynomially bounded weights.
The gap is thus a function-space property, a mismatch between the kernel's smoothness bias and the target's compositional structure, rather than a generic kernel-versus-network phenomenon.
Arkaprabha Ganguli, Emil M. Constantinescu· 1 citation
Uniform stability is a classical tool for controlling the generalization error of a learning algorithm. Bousquet, Klochkov, and Zhivotovskiy (2020) showed that the problem can be reduced to a moment inequality for a sum of weakly interacting functions of independent random variables. Their bound contains an additional factor $\log n$, and they asked whether this factor can be removed. We answer this upper-bound question affirmatively. More specifically, let $Z=(Z_1,\ldots,Z_n)$ have independent coordinates and let $g_i(Z)$ satisfy $$ \mathbb E[g_i(Z)\mid Z_{-i}]=0, \qquad \left| \mathbb E[g_i(Z)\mid Z_i]\right|\le M, \qquad \forall i = \overline{1, n} $$ while changing any coordinate $Z_j$, $j\neq i$, changes $g_i$ by at most $\beta$ and $Z_{-i}$ denotes all coordinates except $Z_i$. We prove that, for every $p\ge2$, $$ \left\| \sum_{i=1}^n g_i(Z)\right\|_p \le 16pn\beta+M\sqrt{2pn}. $$ This removes the $\log n$ factor from the previous bound and matches the lower bound of Bousquet, Klochkov, and Zhivotovskiy up to universal constants in the range covered by their construction. Our proof first establishes the required estimate on the Rademacher cube, then transfers it to arbitrary product distributions by a two-copy randomization argument.
