Skip to content
Preprint

Adversarial Robustness for Small Frequency Moments and a Weak Equivalence Theorem for Turnstile Streams

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 65 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is proved that for any sub-multiplicative norm, the existence of an efficient classical linear sketch is equivalent to the existence of an efficient robust turnstile algorithm, up to polynomial factors, formalizing $L_1$ embeddability as the fundamental mechanism governing both models.

Abstract

We study adversarially robust algorithms for insertion-deletion (turnstile) streams, where future updates may depend on past algorithm outputs. While recent work achieved a robust $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation for the second moment $F_2$ in polylogarithmic space, achieving high accuracy for other frequency moments remained a major open question; for $p\in[0,2)$, including the fundamental distinct elements problem ($F_0$), only constant-factor approximations were known in sublinear space. We close this gap, showing that $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate robustness can be achieved in polylogarithmic space for all $p\in[0,2]$. Our approach generalizes the estimator-corrector-learner framework to non-Hilbert spaces by dynamically maintaining implicit isometric embeddings into $L_2$ and performing regularized kernel ridge regression over adaptively discovered hard queries, yielding the first insertion-deletion algorithms that approximate: (1) the $p$-th frequency moment $F_p$ up to a $(1+\epsilon)$-factor in poly$(1/\epsilon, \log n)$ space for all $p\in[0,2]$, including the support size $F_0$, (2) metric and information-theoretic quantities, including the Earth Mover Distance (EMD) and $k$-median clustering cost over $[\Delta]^d$ up to an $O(d \log \Delta)$-factor, and the Shannon entropy up to an $\epsilon$-additive error, and (3) non-normed symmetric losses defined by Bernstein functions up to a $(1+\epsilon)$-factor. For the $F_p$ moments, our algorithm is optimal up to poly$(1/\epsilon, \log n)$ factors. Furthermore, we establish a weak equivalence between classical oblivious sketching and adversarial robustness. We prove that for any sub-multiplicative norm, the existence of an efficient classical linear sketch is equivalent to the existence of an efficient robust turnstile algorithm, up to polynomial factors, formalizing $L_1$ embeddability as the fundamental mechanism governing both models.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Bagging Robustly Learns VC Classes with Linear Sample Complexity

It is proved that VC classes are adversarially robustly learnable with sample complexity linear in the VC dimension $d$, providing an exponential improvement over the previous upper bound of Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro (2019).

Omar Montasser · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

An Efficient Minimax-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial $m$-Set Bandits

Setting $m=1$ proves that the $\log K$ for ordinary $K$-armed bandits against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries is unavoidable, closing the remaining $\sqrt{\log K}$ gap between confidence-tuned upper and lower bounds left by Gerchinovitz and Lattimore.

F. Bacchiocchi, Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Random Parameter Noise Does Not Make Exact ReLU Verification Easy

The result concerns worst-case base networks in the stated absolute-noise model, but it shows that parameter nondegeneracy alone does not yield a universal smoothed-polynomial guarantee for exact verification.

Mojtaba Soltanalian · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Adversarial Resilience of Poisson-Process Submodular Maximization over Matroids: From Robust Offline Optimization to Full-Bandit Learning

The main result is an adversarial resilience theorem for the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson): without modifying its Poisson intensity, single-element exchange rule, or spiteful drop step, the algorithm retains limiting approximation factors for non-monotone objectives and $1-1/e for monotone objectives.

Vaneet Aggarwal · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Noisy k-means++ is Not too Noisy

An expected approximation guarantee of an expected approximation guarantee of $8(\ln k+2)\left(\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}\right)^4 = (1+O(\varepsilon))\,8(\ln k+2)$.

Poojan Shah · 0 citations