SkillSentry is proposed, a skill-oriented runtime assurance framework built upon a new domain-specific language (DSL) for representing runtime guidance for skill execution that improves the task success rate of LLM agents by 24.1% across skills, on average, while exhibiting lower variability across repeated runs.
Abstract
LLM agents are increasingly equipped with skills to perform complex tasks through multi-step reasoning and tool use. Although skills provide reusable procedural knowledge, agents may still execute them unreliably. Even when an agent has demonstrated the capability to complete tasks under the guidance of a skill, it may fail to do so consistently across similar tasks or repeated runs due to deviations from the skill procedure or incorrect execution of individual steps. Such instability limits the practical reliability of LLM agents. To address this problem, we propose SkillSentry, a skill-oriented runtime assurance framework built upon a new domain-specific language (DSL) for representing runtime guidance for skill execution. SkillSentry initializes the runtime guidance by combining a skill specification extracted from the corresponding skill document with execution experience mined from historical successful and failed traces. It then wraps around the agent execution loop to monitor and guide skill execution under the current guidance, while iteratively refining the guidance using newly collected traces. We evaluate SkillSentry on 15 skills across two LLM agents, each paired with two backbone models, i.e., Claude Code with Claude-Haiku-4.5 and Claude-Opus-4.6, and Codex with GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.4. Our results show that SkillSentry improves the task success rate of LLM agents by 24.1% across skills, on average, while exhibiting lower variability across repeated runs.
Results show that execution evidence can expose behavioral failures missed by artifact inspection and can guide Skill generation toward jointly verified functional and safety outcomes.
Zhi-Bo Zhang, Zheng-Mao Ouyang, Ling Shi et al.· 0 citations
This work investigates an alternative approach in which skill packages are instead invoked as subagents, and shows that subagent execution outperforms agent-skill execution when skill packages expose clear input-output contracts and their instructions encode the procedural knowledge needed to fulfill those contracts.
Wasu Top Piriyakulkij, Rachel Lawrence, Alicia Curth et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces SkillTV-Bench, a 681-case benchmark of real agent trajectories from 50 tasks across eleven domains, designed to evaluate skill-aware trajectory verification for both LLM-as-a-Judge and Agent-as-a-Judge methods, and proposes SkillTV-Evolve, which externalizes verification knowledge as a reusable Jud...
Zhien Han, C. Zeng, Liuhaichen Yang et al.· 0 citations
These results show that compiling procedural structure improves the reliability and efficiency of skill execution while retaining model judgment where it is needed, and shows that compiling procedural structure improves the reliability and efficiency of skill execution while retaining model judgment where it is needed.
Jayanaka L. Dantanarayana, Savini Kashmira, Lingjia Tang et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
A differential analysis framework that attributes a failure or regression to a skill by comparing a target skill-guided run against a no-skill or semantically matched skill reference run that solves the same task, or solves it more cheaply.
Gen Dong, Yanjie Gao, Li-Qun Li et al.· 8 citations· ⚡1
ACES (Agentic Continuous Evaluation of Skills), a repository-native framework for evaluating skills and product capability packages as executable agent artifacts, is presented.
Christopher Kevin, Narendran Raghavan, J. Puget et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.