This Review synthesizes recent progress in Embodied AI and articulate Intent-Driven Embodied Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI) as a system-level organizing framework in which intent functions as an explicit, revisable, and verifiable mediating construct between human goals, environmental constraints, and agent behavior.
Abstract
Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) has emerged as a promising paradigm for developing more general and adaptive intelligent systems, emphasizing that intelligence emerges from continuous interaction among perception, cognition, and action in real-world environments. Recent advances increasingly integrate large language models and multimodal learning into embodied agents; however, most existing approaches remain correlation-driven, relying on implicit objectives, task-specific rewards, or prompt-level instructions. As a consequence, intent is rarely represented explicitly, limiting causal coherence, long-horizon consistency, and robust value alignment in open-world settings. In this Review, we synthesize recent progress in Embodied AI and articulate Intent-Driven Embodied Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI) as a system-level organizing framework in which intent functions as an explicit, revisable, and verifiable mediating construct between human goals, environmental constraints, and agent behavior. Building on this synthesis, we propose a four-layer conceptual organization-semantic grounding, concept generation and learning, intent modeling, and value alignment-that clarifies how explicit intent mediates perception, cognition, and action in embodied systems. We analyze how existing techniques address recurring failure modes along the intent-to-execution pipeline and highlight the limitations that arise when intent remains implicit. By making intent explicit, revisable, and value-constrained where such structure is needed, IDEAI supports interpretable decision-making, adaptive task decomposition, and value-consistent behavior in open-ended, human-interactive, and safety-critical embodied domains, providing a unifying perspective for advancing Embodied AI toward robust, socially deployable intelligent systems.
A comprehensive review of VLA models for Embodied AI from an action‐generation perspective and proposes an action‐generation‐centered taxonomy that categorizes VLA models into three paradigms: direct policy learning, generative action modeling, and reasoning‐guided modeling.
Ning Xiong, Mingle Xu, Wei Chen et al.· Journal of Field Robotics· 0 citations
This study explores the evolving landscape of embodied intelligence, and presents a comprehensive survey on leveraging reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance embodied intelligence, systematically addressing the evolution from single-task performance in controlled settings to sophisticated cross-environment and cross-ta...
This work synthesizes perspectives from philosophy, cognitive science, and AI to define agency, outline its key properties, and situate it in relation to existing paradigms such as reinforcement learning, symbolic reasoning, Belief–Desire–Intention (BDI) architectures, and embodied cognition.
Capek 0.5 is presented, an embodied vision-language model built around an execution-centric capability taxonomy that improves the large majority of matched benchmark rows over its initialization, retains all four specialized capabilities in one checkpoint with quantified losses, and transfers to closed-loop embodied ta...
Ying Chen, Wei-Zhen Li, Zhe Hu et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
The evidence demonstrates that robots and AI can exceed humans in speed, consistency, data processing, and narrowly specified tasks, while humans remain comparatively strong in contextual reasoning, open-ended adaptation, social meaning, moral responsibility, and the interpretation of ambiguous goals.
O. Ohilebo· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
This work proposes ParallelWorld, a multi-horizon test-time scaling framework for embodied reasoning that empowers agents to simulate and evaluate multi-step future trajectories in parallel before committing to an action.
Min Chen, Shengjun Zhang, Yu-Xin Li et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.