Skip to content
#software testing Open access

An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity.

Aug 2026 · PLoS Computational Biology · Vol 22 8, pp. e1014617 · 0 citations · 56 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Making ISF available as a standalone online resource, it is believed it will facilitate the generation, simulation and analysis of models that reveal mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity beyond the barrel cortex for which it was originally designed.

Abstract

How can we identify the mechanistic origins of the electrophysiological activity that is recorded from neurons in the living brain? A promising strategy for addressing this question is to generate biologically realistic models of in vivo recorded neurons, and simulate how they transform synaptic inputs from the network into their observed neuronal activity. For this purpose, we here provide our approaches for the generation, simulation, and analysis of network-embedded neuron models as an open source, fully documented and freely available software environment: In Silico Framework (ISF). ISF is centered around the concept of achieving "model consensus" about the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity across biologically diverse sets of models. To achieve such model consensus, ISF offers three key workflows. First, ISF enables users to generate models that are equally well constrained by empirical data at subcellular, cellular and network scales, while the set of models as a whole is constructed to exhibit maximally diverse parameters, spanning the full ranges permitted by the empirically observed biological variability at each scale. Second, ISF enables users to identify those subsets of model configurations that predict the in vivo observations without being tuned to do so. Third, for each of those model configurations, ISF enables users to identify which mechanisms at subcellular, cellular and network scales are necessary to predict the in vivo observations, and which mechanisms are dispensable. Thereby, ISF can reveal which mechanisms are common across model configurations, and whether the diversity of model configurations could account for the variability of the in vivo observed activity across animals, cells and trials. In essence, by achieving such model consensus, ISF predicts mechanisms that are robust across biological variability, and which may hence indeed be used in vivo. Finally, ISF enables users to derive model consensus for in silico manipulations, to identify which experimental strategies would be best suited to test the predicted mechanisms in vivo. We exemplify how we have used this iterative in silico - in vivo approach of ISF to dissect the mechanistic origins of sensory responses in the barrel cortex. By making ISF available as a standalone online resource, we believe it will facilitate the generation, simulation and analysis of models that reveal mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity beyond the barrel cortex for which it was originally designed.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

BRIDGE: A Computational Workflow from Single Neurons to Network of Mean-Field Models

BRIDGE provides a reproducible foundation for developing biologically informed mean-field models suitable for large-scale and whole-brain simulations, supporting the transition from generic homogeneous population models toward region-specific ones.

Ilaria Carannante, D. Depannemaecker, M. Woodman et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Identifying and investigating emergent behaviour in neural systems

This manuscript distil theoretical approaches to emergence into a practical framework for assessing system behaviour focussed on “novelty” as a necessary condition for emergence and identifies a range of ways in which novelty can arise.

K. C. A. Wedgwood, Patrick McGivern, Alexander R. Harris · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Transcriptome-Inspired Spiking Simulations Uncover Human-Specific Prefrontal Dynamics and Provide a Mechanistic Platform for Species-Appropriate Disease Modeling

Whole-brain transcriptomic atlases are now widely available, yet computational neural models are almost exclusively parameterized from rodent data and used to infer human brain function, an extrapolation whose cost remains unquantified. To address this, we constructed a biophysically detailed, conductance-based Hodgkin–Huxley spiking microcircuit of a five-population prefrontal network, where every ion-channel, receptor, and gap-junction conductance was scaled by cell-type-specific gene expression. We parameterized the identical circuit using single-nucleus RNA-seq from mouse mPFC and human DLPFC, alongside a literature-derived baseline, and compared their high-frequency-oscillation (HFO) outputs across seven physiological and pathological states. While population firing rates differed only modestly between the two refinements (∼20% for pyramidal and PV cells), the oscillatory dynamics diverged dramatically. The human-refined circuit generated strongly synchronized PV activity and robust ripple- and fast-ripple-band power (e.g., healthy-wake ripple power, in arbitrary units: 322 vs. 24 and 22), whereas the mouse-refined and literature arms remained asynchronous (interneuron synchrony: 0.21 vs. 0.02). This human ≫mouse ≈ original hierarchy was statistically consistent across all seven states (significant arm differences in 75/77 comparisons). Mechanistically, the human transcriptome drove markedly stronger PV–PV electrical coupling (gap-junction scale: 1.78 vs. 0.96) paired with stronger recurrent pyramidal excitation, which collectively synchronized the fast-spiking PV population into a coherent rhythm that perisomatic inhibition then imposed on the local field potential. Critically, these results are model-dependent; the gene-to-conductance mapping is phenomenological, and mRNA expression does not linearly translate to functional conductance. Nonetheless, under this mapping the divergence localizes PV-mediated coupling and excitation–inhibition balance as the parameters most in need of human-specific recalibration. More broadly, this work establishes transcriptome-informed spiking simulation as a powerful strategy for uncovering species-specific computational principles and for building mechanistically grounded, human-relevant models of prefrontal circuit dysfunction, an approach that moves beyond generic rodent defaults to enable targeted, species-appropriate modeling of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Qian-Quan Sun, Yihan Wang, Chunzhao Zhang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Unified Computational Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation at the Cellular and Network Levels

A comprehensive phenomenological computational model is proposed that accounts for the impact of electrical stimulation parameters on neuronal circuits while incorporating experimentally-validated synaptic and cellular constraints and provides a mechanistic framework for understanding DBS representation and propagation in neuronal networks.

D. Crompton, L. Milosevic, M. Lankarany · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

BrainEnrich: Revealing Biological Insights for Imaging‐Derived Phenotypes Through Transcriptomic Enrichment

BrainEnrich is introduced, an R package that integrates whole‐brain gene expression profiles from the Allen Human Brain Atlas with in vivo imaging‐derived phenotypes (IDPs) and provides a flexible framework for integrating macro‐level IDPs with micro‐level transcriptomic profiles for molecular contextualization of IDPs.

Zhipeng Cao, D. Yuan, Jinmei Qin et al. · 0 citations
Open access

Mechanisms of Correlated Neuronal Activity in the Globus Pallidus

A computational model was developed in which GPe neurons are represented as coupled phase oscillators influenced by experimentally derived phase-response curves and extrinsic inputs, showing that while the model captures general trends, discrepancies exist in peak amplitude and decay rates, suggesting that key biological details of the GPe are not represented in the model.

Hamza Albawaliz · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.