It is concluded that their ability to retain additive genetic variance depends on the models' architectural complexity, and when sufficiently complex, DL-based models exhibit greater retention of additive genetic variance.
Abstract
Abstract In several simulation studies, long-term selection led to the rapid depletion of genetic variance. These outcomes differ from real-life observations that we aim to replicate, thereby highlighting a fundamental limitation of current classical quantitative genetic simulation models. Deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated promising results in capturing complex interactions essential for maintaining genetic variance; thus, we hypothesize that DL-based genetic simulation models may preserve more genetic variance than classical models, because the biological pathways underlying complex traits exhibit interactions that classical models ignore. The primary objective of this study was to introduce alternative DL-based genetic simulation models and compare them with classical genetic simulation models in terms of their retention of additive genetic variance under truncation selection in a simulated full-sib pig breeding scheme using real haplotypes as founders. After 20 generations of directional truncation selection, the classical models (A, ADAA, and ADAAADDD) retained between 55% and 64% of their initial additive genetic variance. In contrast, while the DL_simple model lost all its additive variance, the DL medium retained 92% to 98% of its additive variance, and the DL_complex model's initial additive variance increased by 296% to 314%. This paper introduces DL-based genetic simulation models and concludes that their ability to retain additive genetic variance depends on the models' architectural complexity. When sufficiently complex, DL-based models exhibit greater retention of additive genetic variance because they intrinsically capture epistatic interactions that are converted into additive variance, as selection progresses, thus, affirming the role of non-additive genetic effects in maintaining long-term genetic variation.
A comprehensive overview of GS methodologies is provided, first covering the statistical foundations of linear mixed and Bayesian models, and then modern ML and DL approaches, to provide practical guidance for optimizing genomic evaluation strategies in the era of big data breeding.
Li-Fei Zhang, Mingzhu Zhang, Xinle Wang et al.· Journal of Animal Science an...· 1 citation
It is suggested that linear and nonlinear models have complementary roles in genomic prediction, with linear models being more suitable for ranking individuals and nonlinear models contributing to reduced prediction error in the simulated scenarios evaluated.
D. Silva, Gian Carlo Ianoni Seidel, João Pedro Inoe Araújo et al.· Peer Review· 0 citations
This work presents fastrho, a state-space neural-network estimator trained across a range of simulation-based priors, and establishes fastrho as a flexible framework for robust recombination mapping across diverse biological systems.
Kevin Korfmann, Neda Rahnamae, Sara Mathieson· bioRxiv· 0 citations
It is suggested that nonlinear machine learning do not uniformly outperform standard PRSs; rather, their relative performance depends jointly on genetic architecture and training sample size.
J. Zhu, A. Baousi, A. P. Morris et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that PGS and PGS–GS algorithms achieve predictive accuracy competitive with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) while offering markedly higher computational efficiency, and incorporating PGS-derived prior information into weighted linear and non-linear models outperformed conventional wei...
Jin-Bu Wang, Li-Li Du, Zhi-Da Zhao et al.· Briefings in Bioinformatics· 0 citations
Overall, the proposed statistical decomposition and component-wise modeling improved the use of environmental and genomic information, although the magnitude and source of predictive gains were strongly trait-dependent.