Aug 2026· Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery· 0 citations· 25 references
Medicine
TL;DR
AI chatbots can generate accurate and comprehensive responses to common tracheostomy care questions, demonstrating potential to support patient education, but they continue to lack guaranteed, verifiable sourcing.
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy, completeness, clarity, source transparency, and readability of leading AI chatbot responses to patient questions about tracheostomy and to determine whether AI tools can reliably support patient education where high-quality guidance is critical for safety.
STUDY
Design
Cross-sectional content analysis.
Setting
Virtual study environment using publicly accessible AI platforms, with expert evaluation conducted via Qualtrics-based distribution.
Methods
Twelve frequently asked questions about tracheostomy care were identified using search-listening tools and clinician input, then submitted to 5 AI chatbots - ChatGPT4, Google Gemini 2.0, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek V3, and Grok 3 - and to a senior laryngologist. Three blinded laryngologists independently evaluated each response using the Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence instrument. Readability was assessed using nine metrics.
Results
Gemini 2.0 achieved significantly higher completeness scores than physician responses (P < .001), with DeepSeek and Grok 3 (P < .05) also outperforming (P < .05). Accuracy did not differ significantly between AI- and expert-generated responses. On average, the AI models outperformed physician in clarity, completeness, and usefulness based on QAMAI scoring (P < .05). All AI and expert responses exceeded the NIH-recommended 6th-grade reading level, ranging from 10th-13th grade (P < .001). Inter-rater reliability was 78%.
Conclusion
AI chatbots can generate accurate and comprehensive responses to common tracheostomy care questions, demonstrating potential to support patient education. However, they continue to lack guaranteed, verifiable sourcing, and this study did not assess actual patient comprehension of the AI-generated responses. Future efforts should focus on adapting AI-generated education materials to meet health literacy standards and evaluating their direct impact on patient understanding and outcomes.
Patients with hallux valgus increasingly seek health information through consumer-facing artificial intelligence (AI)–driven patient education tools, particularly large language model–based conversational agents. Although these tools offer rapid and accessible responses, concerns remain regarding the reliability,...
A. Koluman, Ebru Aloğlu Çiftçi, Mehmet Utku Çiftçi et al.· BMC Medical Informatics and...· 0 citations
ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-5 provide generally satisfactory yet non-comprehensive, limited-quality information at a level above tenth-grade regarding hallux rigidus fusion surgery.
Kamil Balaban, Mehmet Batu Ertan, Mahmut Kalem· Digital Health· 0 citations
Assessment of the quality, readability, and understandability of LLM‐generated content for elective scrotal procedures for benign pathology found LLMs provide high quality, understandable and mostly accurate patient educational content, however, outputs are written at excessively high reading levels, potentially limiti...
Darcy Noll, T. Milton, P. Stapleton et al.· Trends in Urology & Men'...· 0 citations
DeepSeek demonstrates a significant advantage in information reliability, particularly excelling in postoperative and follow-up management content, and ChatGPT shows a slight edge in the readability of surgical planning sections.
Ling Tian, Long-Yue Tang, Ming-Tao Yang et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
AI-generated PILs offer brevity but do not consistently improve readability, with some indices suggesting increased complexity, and clinician oversight and further validation are essential to ensure AI-generated materials enhance, rather than hinder, patient understanding and engagement.
N. Kharma, S. Gill, Chayan Shanmugaratnam et al.· Journal of Orthopaedic Surge...· 0 citations
ChatGPT 5.2 is a valuable AI–assisted chatbot that facilitates patient education by providing responses regarding sleeve gastrectomy that are generally accurate and acceptable, but the categorization of 4–16% of the responses as "Incorrect," the overall difficult readability levels, and the significant variability obse...
Furkan Türkoğlu, Elif Nur Gencer, Emre Erdoğan· Archives of Current Medical...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.