Skip to content

Sensitivity Sampling with Predictions for k-Means Clustering

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.04949 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work formally proves that current theoretical results on coresets construction via sensitivity sampling hold for coarser approximations of sensitivities compared to the one required by existing approaches, and proposes a natural predictor, which applies to the common scenario where clustering is performed on a sequence of datasets from the same problem.

Abstract

We study the problem of k-means clustering on large datasets. The state-of-the-art for the problem is given by coresets-based approaches, which build small weighted summaries of the input and derive approximate solutions with rigorous quality guarantees from them. One of the most popular and advanced approaches to derive coresets for k-means is sensitivity sampling. However, sensitivity sampling requires to compute the importance of each input point with respect to the whole dataset over all possible choices of centers. Since the exact computation of such quantities is unfeasible, current approaches work by approximating the sensitivity values. Nevertheless, the runtime of such approaches is still impractical for large datasets. In this work, we propose to reduce the runtime of sensitivity-based approaches for k-means by leveraging predictions to approximate the importance of input points. We first formally prove that current theoretical results on coresets construction via sensitivity sampling hold for coarser approximations of sensitivities compared to the one required by existing approaches. This implies that even fairly noisy predictors can be leveraged for sensitivity-sampling approaches. We then propose a natural predictor, which applies to the common scenario where clustering is performed (over time) on a sequence of datasets from the same problem. We prove that when the datasets in the sequence come from the same (unknown) distribution, centers resulting in a low error on one dataset can be used as predictions for sensitivity sampling in subsequent datasets, with guarantees on their quality. We perform an extensive experimental evaluation showing that our approach significantly improves, in terms of clustering cost vs runtime, over uniform sampling and state-of-the-art sensitivity sampling approaches when applied to sequences of datasets.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Aug 2026

Exact k-Center Clustering on Graphs for Small k

It is shown that exact k-center becomes tractable and scalable in the small-k regime introducing a new exact algorithm that borrows concepts from LP-type optimization to obtain exact solutions for interesting classes of real-world datasets.

Stefan Funke, Sabine Storandt · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for $k$-Clustering via Determinantal Sampling

This work shows that significantly smaller coresets are possible under mild and natural assumptions on the underlying data distribution, and introduces a new correlated sampling framework, called \textit{determinantal sampling}, based on a novel application of determinantal point processes.

Diptarka Chakraborty, Satyaki Mukherjee, Gaurav Vallabhdas Revankar et al. · 0 citations

Distillation vs. Sampling for Efficient Training of Learning to Rank Models

A comparative analysis of dataset distillation and sampling methods in the context of LtR indicates that, in contrast to previous studies in computer vision, the selected distillation methods do not outperform random sampling.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Efficient Coreset Selection via K-Nearest Neighbor Graphs

Experiments show that KNNG-CS achieves accuracy comparable to representative gradient-approximation coreset methods, while reducing selection time by $2.3\times$-$41.2\times$ and peak memory to $0.3\%$-$7.5\%$ of the baselines.

Yingfan Liu, Lei-Yu Zhang, Jia-Dong Xie et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Diversity-Based Active Learning: An Evaluation of Metric Spaces for Active Learning Selection

Evaluating the performance of Greedy K-center across a variety of metric spaces shows that mapping unlabeled instances into a predictive probability space and weighting the result by entropy often dominates the other options for active learning selection with Greedy K-center.

Siddharth Chilamkur, D. Hochbaum · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Revisiting Thinning Methods for Kernel Learning Problems

Backward Kernel Herding is introduced, an algorithm that addresses the problem of iteratively removing points from the dataset by iteratively removing points from the dataset, achieving results comparable to current state-of-the-art approaches while accelerating the subsampling process in realistic scenarios where the...

Blanca Cano-Camarero, Yago R. Aguado-Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Ángela Fernández-Pascual et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.