Skip to content

Ethically Designing Customer and Employee Experiences in the Age of AI and Knowledge Automation

Jul 2026 · Australasian Marketing Journal · 1 citation · 82 references

TL;DR

The study introduces and develops the construct of ethical knowledge governance and illuminates the psychological and emotional consequences of AI integration for stakeholders.

Abstract

This study examines how organizations design and implement ethical AI systems to enhance customer and employee experience (CX and EX) while navigating concerns around transparency, autonomy, and trust. Drawing on stakeholder theory and socio-technical systems theory, we conducted qualitative multi-case study across four technology organizations, utilizing interviews, focus groups, document analysis, and observations. Through thematic analysis, we identified nine key themes that cluster into three overarching processes: stakeholder tensions, ethical design practices, and organizational governance. These insights are synthesized into a processual, testable conceptual model linking ethical design mechanisms to CX and EX outcomes. We also show the influence of organizational capabilities and contextual enablers and barriers. The study introduces and develops the construct of ethical knowledge governance and illuminates the psychological and emotional consequences of AI integration for stakeholders. Implications for theory development and organizational practice are discussed.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Oct 2026

Ethics and AI: Designing an Interactive Self-Assessment Tool for Ethical Implementation of AI-enabled Projects

The design and evaluation of an interactive self-assessment tool that enables interdisciplinary teams to assess ethical risks and opportunities throughout the lifecycle of AI-enabled projects and implications for the design of self-assessment tools are presented.

F. Young, Anna Lienbacher, Janne Mascha Beuthel et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Workplace AI ethics through a multi-stakeholder lens: a qualitative inquiry into responsibility, trust, and the limits of principles

Across roles, participants converged on the irreducibility of human responsibility and on the demand for verifiable transparency, but diverged sharply on questions of cultural homogenisation, the locus of accountability between developers and deployers, and the appropriate regulatory response.

Andrej Miklošík, Tanja Rosenbaum · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Duality of AI in Knowledge Management: Correlating Utility Perceptions with Implementation Challenges

A dual perception is revealed in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands, revealing a dual perception in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands.

M. Nakash, E. Bolisani · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Executive Sensemaking of Generative AI Adoption at Enterprise Scale: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Cross-Industry Executive Perspectives

This qualitative study examines how senior executives from technology, financial services, and consumer goods publicly make sense of enterprise-scale generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) adoption. Using a purposively selected, bounded single-case design, it applies reflexive thematic analysis to the complete tran...

Isidro T. Aroy, Rabel B. Catayoc · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Mapping Ethics Orchestration: Reflecting on AI Practitioners' Ethics Engagement Through Ethics Pathways

As AI practitioners play an increasingly central role in developing and deploying AI, understanding how they navigate ethical considerations in day-to-day development remains a critical challenge, especially for middle managers who broker these concerns organizationally. This paper offers a methods-oriented reflection...

Ajit G. Pillai, Inha Cha, Richmond Y. Wong · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.