Skip to content
Preprint

YOLO-PEFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on YOLO Family

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

YOLO-PEFT is proposed, a structure-aware framework that formulates adapter placement as an auditable constraint-planning problem that replaces manual target-module trial and error with explicit, inspectable planning while preserving verified train-save-merge-export paths.

Abstract

Generic parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods transferred from language models can fail silently on real-time detectors, whose heterogeneous operators and detection-specific components impose placement constraints absent from regular Transformer stacks. We propose YOLO-PEFT, a structure-aware framework that formulates adapter placement as an auditable constraint-planning problem. Given a detector graph, a PEFT request, and a resource budget, YOLO-PEFT assigns operator and semantic roles, evaluates explicit operator-validity, detector-semantic, graph-interface, and deployment predicates, records a reason code for each excluded module, and either emits a budgeted target-module plan or returns Refuse before training. Under the official VOC07+12 trainval-to-VOC07 test protocol, planner-selected RS-LoRA reaches 0.7138 and 0.7307 mAP50-95 on YOLO11s and YOLO12s, respectively, compared with 0.6428 and 0.6662 for Full-SFT. On RT-DETR-L, all seven evaluated LoRA-family configurations cross the predefined catastrophic threshold, supporting a calibrated Refuse-to-Full-SFT decision within the evaluated coverage. A controlled YOLO11 audit further shows that LoRA reduces peak training memory by 43.9 percent, although training takes 1.72 times longer. Within the evaluated detector families, placement policies, and calibration coverage, YOLO-PEFT replaces manual target-module trial and error with explicit, inspectable planning while preserving verified train-save-merge-export paths; refusal on unseen detector architectures remains an open validation problem. Project Page: github.com/Tencent/YOLO-Master

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

When to Adapt: Conditional Memory Adapters for Retention-Preserving Domain Specialization

Engram Adapter, a framework that repurposes pretraining-time conditional memory as a post-hoc adapter for frozen LLMs, improves in-domain accuracy while preserving 99.4%--100.1% of average OOD performance; on LegalBench it slightly exceeds the frozen base model on average, whereas comparable always-on baselines degrade...

Jiaxuan Hou, Lei Wang · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

StateTune: Transforming LLM-Assisted EDA Flow Tuning into a Stateful, Closed-Loop Process

StateTune is presented, which reformulates LLM-assisted EDA tuning as a closed-loop, state-carrying process that achieves the strongest final hypervolume on all six benchmark blocks, showing a stable improvement in frontier quality across the full matrix.

Kunlong Li, Shang-Shang Yao, Su Zheng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Fine-Tuning Qwen3-27B for C-to-Rust Code Translation: A Three-Stage Curriculum of Pretraining, Debugging-Aware SFT, and Task-Specific SFT

A three-stage fine-tuning curriculum applied to Qwen3-27B is described that is designed to progressively specialize the model for the C-to-Rust (C2Rust) translation task, and the resulting model is evaluated using the agentic, static-analysis-guided verification framework of SACTOR.

Pu Zhao, Chang-Di Yang, Yi-Xiao Chen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Full-Model Rollback: AuroSFT for Adapter-State Multi-Task Fine-Tuning

AuroSFT is introduced, a parameter-efficient framework that recasts the carried state of overfitting-aware multi-task SFT as a compact, mergeable adapter state and obtains higher accuracy on all five backbones.

Yue Han, Zi-Niu Liu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.