This review article provides a comprehensive overview of current mRNA development pipelines and ongoing clinical trials, and recent advances in mRNA purification techniques, focusing on strategies for dsRNA removal.
Abstract
Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology has emerged as a cornerstone in vaccine development and therapeutic applications, offering key benefits such as high potency, rapid scalability, and cost-effectiveness. The success of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines has underscored their efficacy and safety. However, residual byproducts generated during mRNA synthesis, such as unincorporated caps, nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), DNA templates, enzymes, abortive transcripts, and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), pose significant challenges to the clinical application of the RNA therapy. Among these, dsRNA is particularly problematic as it can activate various innate immune responses, suppress mRNA translation and potentially compromise the therapeutic efficacy of mRNA. Therefore, effectively removing dsRNA from in vitro synthesized mRNA is essential before its used in preclinical or clinical settings. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of current mRNA development pipelines and ongoing clinical trials, and recent advances in mRNA purification techniques. Specifically, we focus on strategies for dsRNA removal, which can be broadly categorized into two approaches: (1) separating or removing dsRNA from in vitro transcription (IVT) mRNA products using methods such as RP-HPLC chromatography and cellulose-based purification; and (2) minimizing dsRNA formation during IVT by employing engineered RNA polymerase mutants, chaotropic agents, and magnetic beads, as well as modifying/optimizing DNA templates or RNA molecules to reduce dsRNA generation. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of these purification methods, the factors influencing the selection of purification strategies, and explore potential future directions for improving dsRNA purification technologies and their applications in mRNA-based therapeutics.
The different forms of RNA-based treat-ments, such as messenger RNAs, small interfering RNAs, and circular RNAs, are discussed in this paper along with their significance in gene regulation and the treatment of disease.
Avinash Verma, Shaweta Sharma· Drug Delivery Letters· 0 citations
circRNA-based cancer vaccines and in vivo chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapies have been documented successively, but the issue of circRNA immunogenicity remains unresolved.
Xin-Yue Wang, Sheng-Nan She, Chi Zhang et al.· Molecular Therapy: Nucleic A...· 0 citations
Challenges persist, including low circularization efficiency for long sequences, elevated manufacturing costs, and inadequate quality control standards, and addressing these issues through improved production workflows and delivery technologies adapted to resource-limited settings will be critical to establishing circR...
D. Cai, Xing-Ling Li, Ruo-Xu Wang et al.· Vaccines· 1 citation
Although HCL translated less protein than either WGE or RRL systems, it showed several advantages, notably a larger linear range and greater sensitivity to mRNA thermal stress and dsRNA impurities.
Benjamin W. Roose, Pankaj Dwivedi, Matthew Schombs· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The unique properties of saRNA have positioned it as an innovative tool for the treatment of various diseases, unlocking more possibilities for clinical applications and outlining future directions for the field.
Yan Zong, Chan-Yuan Jin, Qiang Cheng· Small· 0 citations
Whether mRNA platforms offer incremental benefits over enhanced formulations (such as high-dose, adjuvanted, or recombinant vaccines), which are the preferred options in some countries for older adults, remains to be established.
A. Domnich, Andrea Orsi· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.